My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Planning Commission - 12/01/2005
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Planning Commission
>
2005
>
Agenda - Planning Commission - 12/01/2005
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/21/2025 9:38:15 AM
Creation date
11/23/2005 3:16:10 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Planning Commission
Document Date
12/01/2005
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
168
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Ben tv[inks, applicant, stated maybe they could put one row of parking on:the east side, and put <br />Lbe employee parking on the west. .- <br /> <br />Chairperson Nixt stated that it makes sense to try to move the parking. He indicated that without <br />access off Sunfish Lake Blvd., they have to find a way to get more access off Sunfish Lake Court <br />cm~ning into property. <br /> <br />Commissioner Brauer stated his feeling is that he would hate to see the :applicant land-lock <br />himself so he could not develop the other piece or sell it to someone else. <br /> <br />Associate Planner Dalnes stated that the area the Commission is proposing for parking is also the <br />loading area. <br /> <br />Mr. Minks confirmed that the Planning Commission is suggesting that this could be split into <br />two lots. <br /> <br />Commissioner Johnson stated in some way, yes. <br /> <br />Community Development Director Trudgeon clarified that if they Could,allow for a big enough <br />corridor to the east so they could get direct access to the south they could allow a second building <br />on the south portion of the lot. He added they could put the. employee parking to the south also, <br />~ince e~nployees would understand the movements of the loading dock more than visitors'. ~ <br /> <br />Chairperson Nixt stated it would make sense to lay that out and see if you could put a median to <br />control traffic flow. <br /> <br />Chai~i>erson Nixt asked what access the applicant would like the Planning Commission to take. <br />fie indicated if they approve the site plan it would limit what the applicant is able to do in the <br />future. <br /> <br />Mr. Minks' stated it sounds like he has more work to do. <br /> <br />Community Development Director Trudgeon suggested that they table both of these cases and <br />come back in November. He indicated that maybe nothing can be worked out, but at least they <br />can explore those options. <br /> <br />Mr. Minks agreed to tabling both cases. <br /> <br />Chairperson Nixt noted for the record that Cases 3 and 4, Sketch Plan Review and Site Plan <br />Review of Minks Custom Homes would be tabled until the November, 2005 Planning <br />Commission meeting. <br /> <br />Case #5: <br /> <br />Request for Preliminary Plat Approval for Ramsey Town Center llth <br />Addition; Case of Sharp & Associates <br /> <br />Planning Commission/October 6, 2005 <br /> Page 7 of 30 <br /> <br />?7 <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.