Laserfiche WebLink
C, -I$ <br /> <br />Councihnember <br /> <br />introduced the following resolution and moved-for its adoption: <br /> RESOLUTION #05-12-XXX <br /> <br />RESOLUTION RECEIVING REPORT AND CALLING A PUBLIC HEARING ON <br />IMPROVEMENT PROJECT #06-02 (SEALCOAT AND ,CRACKFILL ST. FRANCIS <br />BLVD FRONTAGE ROAD, SUNWOOD DRIVE, ALPINE DRIVE, WACO STREET IN <br />SECTION 24 ) <br /> <br /> WHEREAS, pursuant to a motion of the Ramsey Public Works Committee, adopted <br />December 13, '2005, a feasibility study for the 2006 Street Maintenance Program has been <br />prepared by Steve Jankowski, City Engineer, with reference to Improvement Project #06-02 <br />(Sealcoat and Crackfill St. Francis Blvd Frontage Road} Sunwood Drive, 5Vaco Street in Section <br />24); and <br /> <br /> WHEREAS, the report was received by the Ramsey City Council on December 13, 2005 <br />which indicates the following.: <br /> <br />Estimated total cost of project <br />Estimated total assessment <br /> <br />$37,900 <br />$2,550 <br /> <br /> Estimated assessment per unit $100 <br /> (3-year term) <br /> <br />NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOL.VED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF <br />RAMSEY, ANOKA COUNTY, STATE OF MINNESOTA, as follows: <br /> <br />1) <br /> <br />That the Ramsey City Council will consider the improvements of crackfilling and <br />sealcoating of such streets in accordance with the report and the assessment of abutting <br />property for all or a portion of the cost of the improvement pursuant to Minnesota <br />Statutes Chapter 429 and the Ramsey City Code Section 4.60 at an estimated total cost of <br />$37,900. <br /> <br />2) <br /> <br />That a public heating shall be held on such proposed improvement on the 24th day of <br />January, 2006 at Ramsey Fire Station, 15050 Armstrong Boulevard NW at 7:00 p.m. and <br />the City Administrator shall give mailed and published notice of such heating and <br />improvement as required by law. <br /> <br />The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Councilmember <br />__ and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: <br /> <br />and the following voted against the same: <br /> <br />RESOLUTION #05,12-XXXf <br /> Page 1 of 2 <br /> <br />-273- <br /> <br /> <br />