Laserfiche WebLink
..i <br /> <br />-68~- <br /> <br />(1) <br /> <br />(2) <br /> <br />l'0) <br /> <br />(9) <br /> <br /> CITY {b F P~&.MS E Y <br />Street b,,Iaintenance Program Assessment <br /> <br />Projects are identified by individual subdivisions, or sy gouping of subdivision <br />and Iota having .sim/hr pavement histor/es and conditions and stinter pavement <br />ar=as per bone.fired unit. <br /> <br />assessment share will be calculated by deterrainingthe.t0taI assessable cost of <br />project and dividing by Lhe number of benefited units. <br /> <br />W'here and 'individuaJ lot has more than one frontaze and not .alt frontao,~s ave <br />scheduled to receive an improvement, or the sm-ne type of improv, ements, the 'lot <br />will be considered benefited ~d be assessed a full shave for the improvement <br />which is conducted along Uhe frontage of the lot that contra, ns the mmn driveway <br />opening. <br /> <br />t:or sezlcoats Md overlays the arnou.nt assessed to benefited property owner is <br />50% of~e ~otal project cost including overhead costs. (1991) <br /> <br />Projects involving sa'ecu which have had previous proposed maintenance projects <br />defeated by petition shall be inedible to rezeive the City's 50% contribution, if <br />the pro)ec~ requffes a more expe~ive maintenance. (i.e. s~'eeu'proposed for <br />se~.lcoad~g project which w~ defeated by citizen petition now am'proposed for a <br />bimrm.nous overlay) (1993) <br /> <br />Where ~.he mie of dividLng the assessable project cost by the' number ofbenefimd <br />units (no 2 above) would result m an assessable share which is N'ossly out of <br />propor~ons to ~e assessable shave bering charged to sin'Jilar lots receiving 'sim/iar <br />h-nprovements, the City Council may elect to assez~ such lots the average <br />assessable share being made to lots receiving sLmilar improvement~ for ffhat <br />project yeah : (1996) <br /> <br />Where a benefited area cont~dns corrmaercial lots having M.dely v ..ary~g sizes, the <br />assessment shall be made based on area of the lot. (200.3) <br /> <br />Where an individual lot has more ~m one fi, oUtage including a &--/veway frontage- <br />on a state or county road, aaad a non-drb~eway frontage on a MSA or city s=ee2 <br />one-half assessment share will be made for an improvement to the MSA or CIV.' <br />street. (1995) <br /> <br />'Where an individual lot has a single frontage on an M£A street, such lots will be <br />assessed the average assessable shuts for the .type of improvement made to non- <br />MSA su-eets receiving that im. provement. (l 992) <br /> <br />Whenever possible towr~o~e units shall, be oo ,=c~ ted in:to individual <br /> projects <br />having a single Imnd use. ~ instances where tow~ouse units must be combined in <br /> <br /> <br />