My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Council - 12/13/2005
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Council
>
2005
>
Agenda - Council - 12/13/2005
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/21/2025 2:00:57 PM
Creation date
12/12/2005 9:27:31 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Council
Document Date
12/13/2005
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
707
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Ms. Brock noted that everyone that abuts their property already has trees. She stated that she has <br />three lines of trees, and many have big Norway pines. She indicated that adding more trees does <br />not seem like it would make much difference. <br /> <br />Chairperson Nixt asked if the proposed buffering complies with City Code. <br /> <br />Community Development Director Trudgeon stated that using the landscaping alone dOes not; it <br />requires a berm. <br /> <br />Chairperson Nixt asked what is planned for the identified outlots. He indicated he sees nothing <br />in the code that provides access to the outlots. He stated they are not rezoning the outlots. He <br />indicated that while this likes nice on paper, they have to look at- the detail and there are a lot of <br />pieces missing. He indicated first you would need to abide by City Code and get a buffer on the <br />northeast comer of the plat. <br /> <br />Chairperson Nixt indicated he would need to see and understand better what is happening with <br />the outlots, and how you gain access to the outlots. He noted that was all TC-2 zoning intended <br />to be Places to Shop. <br /> <br />Community Development Director Tmdgeon indicated that there is a lot of things they do not <br />know. He stated the intention today is that the outlots would be commercial, and they do not <br />want residential streets feeding into it. He noted where access could be gained. He stated there <br />is an access off Bunker Lake to the isolated area to the east, wiT/ch .will probably be a future <br />redevelopment area. He stated the point is well taken that need to see a skeleton of the streets to <br />know how they are accessed. <br /> <br />Commissioner Johnson asked what the thinking was on the northwest comer park. <br /> <br />Community Development Director Trudgeon indicated he cannot really address that, because it <br />is divided by Puma Street, which-brings the question on what the long-term plan is for Puma <br />Street. <br /> <br />Commissioner Johnson indicated he does not see anything ma~cal about the park, but you have <br />the opportunity to rearrange that a little and still provide a park and provide the screening the <br />neighbors want. <br /> <br />Chairperson Nixt indicated that putting the ponding next to Puma Street -would be an opportunity <br />for buffering also. He stated something needs to be done with this comer. Each time they have <br />seen this that comer has been an issue. He indicated if you look at the Planning Commission's <br />comments from the spring this has been a common theme, and he does not think anybody on the <br />Commission Will change on that. <br /> <br />Planning Commission/October 6, 2005 <br /> Page 21 of 30 <br /> <br />-63- <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.