My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Council - 12/13/2005
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Council
>
2005
>
Agenda - Council - 12/13/2005
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/21/2025 2:00:57 PM
Creation date
12/12/2005 9:27:31 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Council
Document Date
12/13/2005
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
707
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Motion failed. Voting Yes: Chairperson Nixt, Commissioners Johnson and Van Scoy. <br />No: Commissioners Brauer, Levine, and Watson. Absent: Commissioner Shepherd. <br /> <br />Voting <br /> <br />Colmnissioner Van Scoy asked if there was an amendment to the motion that would make it <br />agreeable to any o£the others. <br /> <br />Commissioner Levine stated his concern is that there 'are so many issues he would like to see it <br />again. <br /> <br />Chairperson Nixt stated that from his standpoint there are two main concernS; the density issue in <br />the northwest coruer and beefing up the service area in the outlots. He indicated that other than <br />that, he would be proud to see this development in Ramsey. <br /> <br />Commissioner Brauer stated he thinks the issue with the northwest corner is the key, With some <br />of them saying that is enough to say no, and some are okay Saying yes with the belief it will be <br />fixed. <br /> <br />Comlrfissioner Van Scoy indicated that the second access point is the third critical piece. <br /> <br />Chairperson Nixt agreed. <br /> <br />Community Development <br />Commission's discussion <br />Commission. <br /> <br />Director Trudgeon stated that he will bring forward the Planning <br />and report that there was no recommendation by the Planning <br /> <br />Case #10 <br /> <br />Consider Adoption of a Resolution Creating a Redevelopment Project Area <br />for the Highway 10 Interchange Project; Case of City of RamseY <br /> <br />Presentation <br /> <br />Community Development Director Trudgeon stated that the City is in the process of acquiring <br />the Anchors Away/Express Lube building on the north side of Highway 10. He indicated that to <br />facilitate this transaction, the HRA will cOnsider the issuance of lease revenue bonds. <br /> <br />Community Development Director Trudgeon advised that the City Council and HRA have had <br />some preliminary discussions of the Redevelopment Plan, and given preliminary.approval to the <br />creation of the Redevelopment District. He stated that it should be noted that the property is <br />located within the Highway 10 Official Map Area, which is already desig-nated for <br />redevelopment for highway improvement purposes. <br /> <br />Community Development Director Trudgeon stated that in order to issue the bonds, the Planning <br />Commission needs to consider adoption of a resolution to create a Redevelopment Project Area. <br /> <br />Planning Commission/oCtober 6, 2005 <br /> Page 27 of 30 <br /> <br />-60- <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.