Laserfiche WebLink
Revenue Bonds (Fire Station #2), Tax Increment Bonds (Water Tower #2), and Capital <br />Equipment Certificates. In looking through the proposals by Springsted Public Finance Advisors <br />and Juran and Moody, the services they offer are very comparable and either consultant could <br />provide the services requested by the City. Although the scoring was close, Juran and Moody <br />ranked higher than Springsted on a few issues which follow: <br /> <br />1) Proposed Fees for Debt Issuance - The cost of issuing General Obligation debt is fairly <br /> consistent between the firms, but Springsted is considerably higher in the issuance of Lease <br /> Revenue and Revenue Bonds. For example,.Springsted charges $14,250 for the issuance of a <br /> $1,000,000 Lease Revenue Bonds, whereas, Juran and Moody's fee would be $11,250. <br /> Additionally, Springsted charges for all issuance costs involved such as printing of statement, <br /> travel, etc. Juran and Moody's fees for issuance costs are included in the initial fee. <br />2) Studies and Analysis - Juran and Moody perform debt management studies and financial <br /> planning analysis free of charge. Springsted charges a per hour rate for all services that are <br /> non-debt obligation related. <br />3) Personal Attention - The majority of Springsted's clients are large cities such as Maple <br /> Grove, Coon Rapids, and Woodbury. Juran and Moody focus more on the smaller cities, <br /> such as Andover, Chaska, and Osseo. This may seem like a minor detail, but in recent <br /> negotiations with Springsted (who the City has currently used on it bond sales) it was <br /> apparent that Springsted considered the City a minor player. By saying this, staff was <br /> referring to the lack of staff updates and communication between the City and Springsted. A <br /> smaller firm representative, with smaller cities would most likely devote more personal <br /> attention to the City's projects and possibly even expedite important projects. <br /> <br />Finance Officer Lund noted that award of the contract for financial services does not eliminate <br />Springsted Public Finance Advisors from negotiating with the City in future years. The City is, <br />at this time, negotiating a one year agreement. At the end of the term, the City will examine the <br />service offered fi'om the financial consultant and a recommendation will be made as to whether <br />to continue with the said financial institution for the following year. <br /> <br />Kathy Aho, Springsted Public Financial Advisors, stated that she has worked with the City for <br />numerous years and feels that Springsted is the right firm for the City. She explained that <br />Springsted does not buy and sell securities they only .offer advice to their customers. She <br />reviewed the types of services that Springsted has to offer the City of Ramsey. Ms. Aho stated <br />that she understands that there has been some communications problems over the last year <br />between the City of Ramsey and Springsted staff, and explained that Springsted has had <br />numerous turnovers which have impacted the City of Ramsey more than other cities. She stated <br />that Springsted has put together a team that they feel will be a benefit to the City of Ramsey. <br />The first person on the team would be John Moir who recently came to Springsted after being the <br />Finance Director for the City of Minneapolis, the second member on the team would be Brenda <br />Krueger who is in the client services. <br /> <br />John Moir, Springsted Public Finance Advisors, reviewed Springsted's municipal market <br />analysis. He explained that Springsted is the #1 financial advisor in Minnesota and has the <br /> <br />Finance Committee/October 10, 2000 <br /> Page 2 of 5 <br /> <br /> <br />