My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Minutes - Planning Commission - 10/27/2022
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Minutes
>
Planning Commission
>
2022
>
Minutes - Planning Commission - 10/27/2022
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/17/2025 10:51:02 AM
Creation date
12/15/2022 9:58:42 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Type
Planning Commission
Document Date
10/27/2022
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
10
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Planning Manager Larson replied that every type of use does not need to be listed in B-1. He <br />stated that the intent of the coffee shop serving the adjacent neighborhood would be acceptable. <br />He provided some additional examples of neighborhood businesses. <br />Commissioner VanScoy commented that locations and the use of gas stations can be contentious <br />and asked where that would fit. <br />Planning Manager Larson replied that a gas station is more vehicle driven and therefore would not <br />fall under B-1, but more of B-2 or B-3. <br />Commissioner VanScoy asked if exclusions or allowed businesses would be listed anywhere. He <br />asked for additional details on the CUP and when it would be eliminated. <br />Planning Manager Larson replied that a CUP would remain as a tool but there are some requests <br />that do not have any additional conditions when approved and therefore it would be appropriate to <br />use performance standards and eliminate the need for the CUP. He noted that the Commission <br />would still be reviewing the site plan for those requests. <br />Commissioner VanScoy stated that he believed that the purpose for the CUP was that the use <br />would be allowed for that property if found acceptable by the Commission and Council. <br />Planning Manager Larson replied that a conditional use is a permitted use that additional <br />conditions could be placed upon. He provided examples of conditions that could be placed upon <br />a CUP versus the conditions of the site plan review. He stated that a CUP can be revoked, and the <br />business could be shut down if the conditions are not followed. He stated that cemeteries are <br />currently listed as a conditional use, but in reality, could not be shut down and converted to <br />something else, therefore that is most likely not the appropriate use of a CUP. <br />Chairperson Bauer asked for examples on how existing areas would fit into the new zoning <br />districts. <br />Planning Manager Larson replied that the remapping exercise would come at a later time after <br />additional review. <br />Commissioner Gengler commented that she likes the idea of looking at the scope of customers <br />served for the business districts. She liked the reference of access by pedestrians and automobiles <br />but noted that perhaps other multi -modal forms of transportation could be mentioned as well. <br />Planning Manager Larson commented that he believes that pedestrians is a broad term that could <br />include bicycles and other forms of transportation of that nature. <br />Commissioner VanScoy asked how the different levels of outdoor storage would be defined. <br />Planning Manager Larson replied that at some point they will focus more on the performance <br />standards and what would be allowed. He noted that the intent tonight was to focus on the districts <br />Planning Commission/ October 27, 2022 <br />Page 8 of 10 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.