Laserfiche WebLink
2.03: Discussion regarding Resolution #22-005 to Prohibit State and Federal Actors from <br />Mandating Medical Procedures Upon Citizens Through Coercion or Force; and <br />Providing Other Matters Related to the Subject <br /> <br />Deputy City Administrator/ Community Dev. Director Hagen reviewed the staff report. <br /> <br />Mayor Kuzma asked City Attorney Knaak if the mandates are still in the courts and if it was correct <br />that there was no current mandate for the City to do anything. <br /> <br />City Attorney Knaak replied that because of what OSHA did nationally, which is in front of the <br />Supreme Court, the MNOSHA has been using that to come up with some deadlines and <br />requirements. The City have been under some of the deadlines as well. His understanding is that <br />as long as the City is making progress with policies, if the appeal doesn’t come back favorably for <br />the City there wouldn’t be any trouble. His best estimate is the OSHA requirement is what is in <br />jeopardy and that decision should come through sometime this week. He guessed that this might <br />not be even an issue for the City. In the meantime, the deadlines haven’t been put on hold. If the <br />Council wanted to go ahead with things they would still have to talk with the unions’ term and <br />condition of employment and nothing can be immediately implemented. He stated he has been in <br />regular dialogue with fellow city attorneys to compare what other cities are doing and thinks there <br />is a good chance that what is being mandated will be limited. <br /> <br />Mayor Kuzma commented if the Council were to implement a statement of pushback, would it <br />create a position where Ramsey would be set as an example. <br /> <br />City Attorney Knaak replied there is nothing that would jeopardize the City legally. <br /> <br />Councilmember Woestehoff asked City Attorney Knaak to speak to the difference between passing <br />a resolution versus an ordinance. <br /> <br />City Attorney Knaak replied it wasn’t really drafted as an ordinance yet because it does not give <br />any directive or impose any penalty to comply. Usually, an ordinance is a legislative act which <br />imposes certain duties and obligations or prevents certain occurrences by its action and provides <br />for penalties for failure to comply. The third one is a resolution in its form but it doesn’t do those <br />things. He advised that an ordinance could pose problems but a resolution stating the position of <br />the City wouldn’t cause any legal issues. <br /> <br />Mayor Kuzma asked City Attorney Knaak if it would be his advice to table this for a week to see <br />what happens. <br /> <br />City Attorney Knaak replied they are in a discussion phase which isn’t harmful. He added even <br />directing Staff to do something in the future, as long as there is an understanding that this is in the <br />context of a decision that is expected in the next couple of days which will provide information. <br />The Supreme Court may decide OSHA has overstepped its bounds but may still decide to pass a <br />resolution or statement. <br /> <br />City Council Work Session / January 11, 2022 <br />Page 8 of 15 <br /> <br />