Laserfiche WebLink
5.01: Consider Recommendation to City Council to Approve Plans and Authorize Bids for <br /> City Improvement Project#22-17, Ramsey Villas North Sound Wall Improvements <br /> City Engineer/Interim Public Works Director Westby reviewed the staff report and stated that staff <br /> recommends alternative one if the Committee supports constructing a sound wall along the west <br /> edge of the Ramsey Villas North residential development. He noted that staff would recommend <br /> alternative two if the Committee supports constructing a sound wall along the west edge of the <br /> Ramsey Villas North residential development, including salvaging and installing the existing fence <br /> to the Highway 47 right-of-way. <br /> Chairperson Riley stated that he believes the old fence should be removed as part of this project. <br /> He asked if there would be any cost savings in reusing that versus just using new fence. <br /> City Engineer/Interim Public Works Director Westby replied that there would likely not be a cost <br /> savings. He stated that when contractors salvage and reinstall something, it will not be warrantied. <br /> He noted that the existing fence would be fairly difficult to salvage and reinstall because of the <br /> four-foot footings. <br /> Councilmember Woestehoff referenced the existing fence, which is on private property and <br /> therefore owned by the homeowners. He stated that while he agrees that should be removed, it <br /> would require the approval and authorization of the homeowners. He noted that the first property <br /> most likely prefers having the fence in place while the second property would most likely prefer <br /> removal with replacement of a wall that does what was intended. He stated that he would want to <br /> hear the input from the homeowners that have the fence on their property. He stated that if the <br /> fence is left in place, it would seem silly to have two fences in place. He asked if there was <br /> feedback in putting the new fence west of the trail, between the trail and the road. <br /> City Engineer/Interim Public Works Director Westby replied that snow removal on Highway 47 <br /> and the trail would impact the fence in that placement. <br /> Councilmember Woestehoff stated that he supports removing the existing fence, or at least part of <br /> it, but would want the input of the residents as the fence technically now belongs to those <br /> homeowners. <br /> City Engineer/Interim Public Works Director Westby identified the area where the fence would be <br /> proposed to start, noting there would be about 20 feet between the new fence and existing fence. <br /> Councilmember Woestehoff stated that it would be important to advise the homeowners that the <br /> new fence would not be on their private property and therefore would not be their fence, whereas <br /> the existing fence is on private property and would be the property of the homeowners. <br /> Councilmember Musgrove asked for details on the proposed location and length of the fence. <br /> City Engineer/Interim Public Works Director Westby provided additional details as requested. <br /> Public Works Committee/ November 15, 2022 <br /> Page 2 of 9 <br />