My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Minutes - Planning Commission - 05/02/2000
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Minutes
>
Planning Commission
>
2000
>
Minutes - Planning Commission - 05/02/2000
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/20/2025 2:13:00 PM
Creation date
5/22/2003 9:17:14 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Type
Planning Commission
Document Date
05/02/2000
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
23
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
not for expansion. If, in the furore, the applicant wanted to expand he would have to come back <br />for the same process for each request. <br /> <br />Ms. Zegaras asked if the City has seen a business projection from the builder. She mentioned <br />every business has a projection and they are interested in growth projections, not monetary <br />projections. <br /> <br /> hair Nixt stated this is the first time this has been before the City and the business <br />projection is not included in the packet. <br /> <br /> Community Development Assistant Wald stated that Staff recommends the driveway, customer <br /> parking, and employee parking be paved. She noted trucks could deliver in this area 0 -3 times <br /> per week. <br /> <br />~,tetmg tznmrperson Nixt stated there should be a provision in the proposed Conditional Use <br /> Permit for a transfer of the permit from current landowner, Mr. Menard, to applicant, Mr. Barrett. <br /> <br /> 7k~cti~ Chairperson Nixt asked if there is going to be a residence constructed on the property. <br /> <br />Mr. Barrett responded there will not. <br /> <br />A~3fing Chairperson Nixt asked if the City has granted business uses in residential districts on a <br />case by case basis. <br /> <br />Community Development Director Frolik advised it has been the policy since 1990 that the City <br />does not accept applications for Conditional Use Permits to operate businesses out of garages and <br />accessory buildings. When this application was received it was determined that a Conditional <br />Use Permit would gain control over what is happening in a non-conforming building. <br /> <br />"XJ~Chairperson Nixt asked if there was ever a Conditional Use Permit for Mr. Menard's use. <br /> <br /> Community Development Director Frolik responded there was not. <br /> <br />--Acting Chairperson Nixt asked Mr. Menard if he is proposing to apply for a conditional use <br />permit to continue to conduct his business on his homestead parcel. <br /> <br />Community Development Director Frolik informed Mr. Menard he could park his vehicles and <br />equipment on the property as long as he is self-emPloyed and they are screened to a degree of <br />75% or parked indoors. He would not be allowed to have any employees or clients come to his <br />home. <br /> <br />Commissioner Johnson noted Mr. Menard utilized this property for the last 15 years as a <br />business and asked if he would be able to continue to use it in that way at it's present size. <br /> <br />Planning Commission/May 2, 2000 <br /> Page 4 of 23 <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.