My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Planning Commission - 02/16/2023 - Special
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Planning Commission
>
2023
>
Agenda - Planning Commission - 02/16/2023 - Special
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/17/2025 11:19:18 AM
Creation date
2/9/2023 3:53:56 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Planning Commission
Document Title
Special
Document Date
02/16/2023
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
24
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Special Planning Commission <br /> Meeting Date: 02/16/2023 <br /> By: Todd Larson, Community Development <br /> Information <br /> Title: <br /> Residential Districts <br /> Purpose/Background: <br /> At the January 26 Planning Commission meeting,we discussed the proposed business districts section of the <br /> Zoning Code update and asked for some direction on some topics within residential districts. Those topics <br /> included rural residential lot areas, density transitioning, and what the "standard" urbanized single-family lot <br /> dimensions should be. Some direction was provided as well as requests for more information. <br /> Staff researched several other communities that have similar growth characteristics as Ramsey--communities with <br /> a MUSA boundary dividing the city into rural and urban areas and cities that are subject to the Metropolitan <br /> Council review. Attached is a table of the findings for the discussion on the standard urban single-family lot and <br /> rural residential lots. <br /> Rural residential lot areas: <br /> From the research, Ramsey's existing R-1 Rural Developing (R-1 RD) lot area standards appear to be typical of <br /> the other communities'rural residential districts. With only about one-quarter of Ramsey's R-1 RD lots meeting <br /> the current 2.5-acre standard, staff is proposing to add a second district for a 1-acre lot minimum. This would <br /> allow for more lots to be in compliance with the regulations,though there will likely be over one thousand lots <br /> still considered legal nonconforming. An updated map requested by the Planning Commission showing only the <br /> R-1 RD lots is attached (staff previously included lots zoned PUD created for the sole purpose of averaging lot <br /> areas on a map). Staff research found that some communities do have their rural residential districts starting at 1 <br /> acre. <br /> A question came up about the potential of opening up additional lots for subdivision given a smaller lot area. <br /> Staff has contemplated maintaining the same lot width requirements for both districts so that a property is not split <br /> in a long-and-skinny way. <br /> The "standard" urbanized single-family district: <br /> The current urbanized single-family residential district most used in Ramsey is the R-1 MUSA-80 district. With a <br /> quarter-acre lot area and 80 feet in width, it has been difficult, if not impossible,to meet the required density <br /> range from the Comprehensive Plan of 3.0-4.0 units per acre. Density calculations include local roadways and <br /> storm water management. High volume roadways, like County or State roadways as well as natural wetlands are <br /> excluded from the density calculations. Staff s proposal is to slightly reduce the lot width by five feet and area by <br /> 890 square feet in hopes of attaining the required density. This proposal appears to be in-line with other <br /> communities. It should be noted that many communities have a lower density range. Staff is currently in <br /> discussion with our Metropolitan Council Sector Representative to understand this. <br /> Density Transitioning: <br /> At the January Planning Commission meeting, staff presented pictures of where the current standard of <br /> transitioning between urban and rural densities posed some challenges, especially regarding ownership of buffer <br /> outlots and to over-planting trees. Feedback from the Commission was that there should not be this type of <br /> transitioning done between the same uses--single-family. The consensus was that there should be transitioning or <br /> buffering between different uses, such as between single-family and townhomes or between residential and <br /> non-residential uses. The language that is proposed in the attached draft simplifies the requirements by adding 35 <br /> feet to the lot size and principal structure setback when adjacent to a different use. Within that 35-foot area, <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.