Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />September 10, 2013 <br /> <br /> <br />The Honorable John C. Hoffman <br />Chief Judge Tenth Judicial District <br />Washington County Government Center <br />nd <br />14949 – 62 Street North <br />Stillwater, MN 55082-3802 <br /> <br />Re: City of Ramsey, Anoka County, Minnesota, Charter Commission Annual Report <br /> <br />Dear Judge Hoffman: <br /> <br />In accordance with Minnesota Statutes 410.05, the following is an annual report reflecting the <br />activities of the City of Ramsey Charter Commission during the year 2012. <br /> <br />Members of the Charter Commission for year 2012 were as follows: Susan Anderson, Jim <br />Bendtsen Benjamin Deemer, Joseph Field, John Niederhaus, Harry Niska, Marilyn (Moe) Shea, <br />Cindy Sherman, and Chad Sivertson. Commissioners Shea and Sherman did not request <br />reappointment to the Charter Commission when their terms ended December 31, 2012. <br /> <br />The Charter Commission met on March 26, 2102. Commissioner Field was elected as Chair and <br />Commissioner Sherman was elected as Vice Chair for the year 2012. It was noted there were two <br />new members - John Niederhaus and Chad Sivertson. Both replaced resigning members and are <br />filling a term to expire December 31, 2013. <br /> <br />Discussion was held on Chapter 8 of the Charter regarding Special Assessment Petitions. It was <br />noted that currently 35 percent of benefitted property owners can petition for a public <br />improvement, then requiring a simple City Council majority vote to order the improvement, or <br />without a petition, or less than 35 percent of the benefitted property owners petition, the City <br />Council, can, with a four-fifths vote, order the public improvement. The recommendation to the <br />Charter Commission was to consider changing the 35 percent petition numbers to the higher <br />threshold of 50 percent. The reasoning behind the recommendation was to have a higher bar to <br />get a project going before all the commitments and all City resources go forward. This would be <br />more efficient and still meet the intent that the project could be stopped. The City would like to <br />be more efficient – including cost efficient on the front end. The Charter Commission directed the <br />City Attorney to draft an ordinance – changing the petition amount from 35 percent to 50 percent <br />and bringing it back for Charter review. <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />