Laserfiche WebLink
that to 2005 where the City received approximately 39 cents, showing an increase of approximately one <br />cent on every dollar for the City portion of the tax dollar. She also explained the breakdown between <br />City, County, and School District percentages. She explained how property taxes are calculated. <br /> <br />Ms. Lund referred citizens to the Tribune article dated December 4, 2005. She noted that the newspaper <br />stated the average value of the housing market is $230,000. She compared taxation in the Anoka versus <br />the Elk River School District based on the value of $200,000. She noted that in 2005, taxes on a <br />$200,000 home for the Anoka School District were $1,954 and would increase to $1,968. She noted that <br />Elk River School District's taxes were higher because they have a different tax capacity rate. Taxes in <br />the Elk River School District based on a $200,000 home in 2005 were $2,181. Based on the proposed <br />tax capacity rate for 2006, taxes in Elk River School District will be 2,279. <br /> <br />Kevin Hartman, Ramsey resident, approached the City Council with a question. Mayor Gamec asked <br />him which school district he resided in. Mr. Hartman stated that he lives in the Anoka School District. <br />Mr. Hartman asked for further clarification about Limited Market Value. <br /> <br />Ms. Lund explained Limited Market Value calculation again. Mr. Hartman asked for clarification about <br />whether the 15% Limited Market Value was State mandated. <br /> <br />Mr. Hartman asked if the valuation could be less than a 15% increase. He asked if one property might <br />be different, for example 10% versus 15%. <br /> <br />Ms. Lund stated that it could be less, but that is based on the County Assessor's market valuation. She <br />explained that each valuation is different depending on what the property was assessed at in previous <br />years, adding that no two homes are exactly alike. <br /> <br />Mayor Gamec stated that on the same value house, one property's taxes increased by $300.00 the other <br />went up by $40. He clarified that the sale price of the home brings up the market value of an entire area. <br />He stated there may appear to be some inequities based on the sales market but it evens out over the <br />years. <br /> <br />Mr. Hartman stated he has followed his property tax increase since Governor Ventura changed things. <br /> <br />Ms. Lund read Minnesota Statute 273.1 I, "For assessment year 2008, the amount of the increase shall <br />not exceed the greater of 15% of the value in the preceding assessment or 50% of the difference between <br />the current assessment and the preceding assessment." <br /> <br />Mr. Hartman asked where the assessor gets his information. He stated that had he tried to sell his home <br />last year as opposed to selling it this year, he may not have sold it for the same amount of money because <br />of the market situation. <br /> <br />Mayor Gamec stated that the Assessor looks at the market of the area, but the assessment is based on <br />sales of the area. He stated the problem the City sees at the Local Board of Review in April when <br />people come in to protest their valuation, is there may only be four or five sales a year. He stated the <br />Assessor takes the higher value. <br /> <br />Mr. Hartman asked if the Assessor looked at most recent sales. <br /> <br />City Council Truth in Taxation/December 5, 2005 <br /> Page 3 of 13 <br /> <br /> <br />