My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Planning Commission - 02/02/2006
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Planning Commission
>
2006
>
Agenda - Planning Commission - 02/02/2006
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/21/2025 9:39:00 AM
Creation date
1/27/2006 1:17:10 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Planning Commission
Document Date
02/02/2006
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
255
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Sub;err/sots, 9t Cal. App, 4th 34z (2Dot), in <br />which the court held that the county's amend- <br />ment of a specific plan for an industrial area <br />near its airport was inconsistent with the <br />county's general plan. The industrial land use <br />was in an area designated in the general plan <br />for industrial uses, However, the circulation <br />etement of the general plan identified traffic <br />problems and the housin~ e~ement identified <br />a housing shorta§e. AccorUin~ to the court, <br /> <br /> The CounW cannot state a polio/of <br /> <br /> As a result, the court found that the <br />amendment would frustrate the genera[ ptan's <br />~oais and policies, and hence, was not consis- <br />tent with the general ptan. <br /> <br />Lesher Commun/cations. Inc. v. Ci~ of Walnut <br />Creek, 5z CaL 3d 531~ SM, (t99o). zoning and <br /> <br />wag the dog." Nevertheless, because of the <br /> <br />in)~ district may de consistent with the land-use <br />categories designated in a comprehensive plan. <br />Zonin~/piannin§ consistency does not eliminate <br />the need to comply with standards and require- <br />ments found in the applicable zonin§ ordi- <br /> <br />the existing zonin~ for the property. Just <br /> <br />pLAN <br /> <br />UL Urban Low-Oensity <br /> Residentia~ <br /> <br />UM Urban Medium- <br /> Density Residential <br /> <br />UH Urban High-Density <br /> Residential <br /> <br />NC Neighborhood <br /> Commercial <br /> <br />CC Community <br /> Commercial <br /> <br />CG General Commercial <br /> <br />MU Mixed Use <br /> <br />EC Employment Center <br /> <br />ML Li[ht Industrial <br /> <br />MH Heavy Industrial <br /> <br />A Airport <br /> <br />PF Public Facilities <br /> <br />ZONE <br />RZ Single-Family <br /> Residential Districts <br /> <br />R Residential Districts <br /> <br />OR Office-Residential <br /> Districts <br /> <br />CL Commercial Districts <br />C <br /> <br />MX Mixed-Use District <br /> <br />DC Office Campus District <br /> <br />BP Business Park District <br /> <br />MH~ Industrial Districts <br /> <br />U University District <br /> <br />A Airport District <br /> <br />CLARK COUNTY, WASHINGTON, URBAN PLAN DESIGNATION TO ZONE CONSISTENCY CHART <br /> (Shaded areas indicate allowed zones in each desi~'nation) <br /> <br />152 ZONiNGPq' . ::C~ tc.o5 <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.