Agenda - Planning Commission - 02/23/2023

Home

Planning Manager Larson commented that a majority of those properties would already be lawful nonconforming. Commissioner Van Scoy asked how this occurred to have these smaller nonconforming lots. Councilmember Woestehoff commented that there is a development, south of Central Park and east of Armstrong, which was developed before the City incorporated. He imagined that the City inherited a lot of these lot sizes. Planning Manager Larson agreed noting that there were many PUDs that allowed smaller lots. Commissioner Gengler commented that it would seem that only one third of the area zoned for 2.5 acre lots actually has 2.5 acre lots. Commissioner Hunt recognized that this issue already exists and therefore is unsure what the best answer would be. Councilmember Woestehoff asked if PUDs would be allowed to continue to exist in the zoning update. Planning Manager Larson commented that will be part of the continued zoning discussion. He stated that it would seem that PUDs were used in the past to secure lesser lot sizes in return for open space dedication. He noted that going forward staff would suggest that it be used to support a mix of different developments within one overall development rather than a tool used simply for obtaining smaller lots sizes. He moved to the topic of density, providing input on the challenges in reaching the required density. Commissioner Van Scoy stated that the intent with 80-foot lots was to reach the four units per acre but recognized that the stormwater areas and roads make that difficult. He supported further investigation as to what would allow achievement of density. Commissioner Gengler stated that she does support smaller lot sizes. Councilmember Woestehoff stated that he does find it interesting to see what other communities are doing and reviewed the requirements for Anoka. Planning Manager Larson commented that the intent in updating the zoning code is to be compliant with the Comprehensive Plan. He reviewed information on density transitioning including the current requirements and potential ideas to consider. Commissioner Peters provided input on the density transitioning that was done by a development, noting that there were not requirements on spacing or watering and it did not turn out well. Chairperson Bauer asked if this could be left open and developments could be reviewed on a case- by-case basis to determine screening needs. Planning Commission/January 26, 2023 Page 14 of 16