Laserfiche WebLink
Regular Planning Commission 7.2. <br /> Meeting Date: 02/23/2023 <br /> By: Todd Larson, Community Development <br /> r <br /> Information <br /> Title: <br /> Zoning Code Update: Residential Districts (Continued Discussion) <br /> Purpose/Background: <br /> At the January 26 Planning Commission meeting,we discussed the proposed business districts section of the <br /> Zoning Code update and asked for some direction on some topics within residential districts. Those topics <br /> included rural residential lot areas, density transitioning, and what the "standard" urbanized single-family lot <br /> dimensions should be. Some direction was provided as well as requests for more information. The Planning <br /> Commission began discussing this section at its special meeting on February 16. We will pick up this discussion <br /> at Section 460 on Page 10. Time permitting,we can go back to the start of this section for the benefit of the <br /> Commissioners who were not able to attend the meeting on the 16th. <br /> Staff researched several other communities that have similar growth characteristics as Ramsey--communities with <br /> a MUSA boundary dividing the city into rural and urban areas and cities that are subject to the Metropolitan <br /> Council review. Attached is a table of the findings for the discussion on the standard urban single-family lot and <br /> rural residential lots. <br /> Rural residential lot areas: <br /> From the research, Ramsey's existing R-1 Rural Developing (R-1 RD) lot area standards appear to be typical of <br /> the other communities'rural residential districts. With only about one-quarter of Ramsey's R-1 RD lots meeting <br /> the current 2.5-acre standard, staff is proposing to add a second district for a 1-acre lot minimum. This would <br /> allow for more lots to be in compliance with the regulations,though there will likely be over one thousand lots <br /> still considered legal nonconforming. An updated map requested by the Planning Commission showing only the <br /> R-1 RD lots is attached (staff previously included lots zoned PUD created for the sole purpose of averaging lot <br /> areas on a map). Staff research found that some communities do have their rural residential districts starting at 1 <br /> acre. <br /> A question came up about the potential of opening up additional lots for subdivision given a smaller lot area. <br /> Staff has contemplated maintaining the same lot width requirements for both districts so that a property is not split <br /> in a long-and-skinny way. <br /> The "standard" urbanized single-family district: <br /> The current urbanized single-family residential district most used in Ramsey is the R-1 MUSA-80 district. With a <br /> quarter-acre lot area and 80 feet in width, it has been difficult, if not impossible,to meet the required density <br /> range from the Comprehensive Plan of 3.0-4.0 units per acre. Density calculations include local roadways and <br /> storm water management. High volume roadways, like County or State roadways as well as natural wetlands are <br /> excluded from the density calculations. Staff s proposal is to slightly reduce the lot width by five feet and area by <br /> 890 square feet in hopes of attaining the required density. This proposal appears to be in-line with other <br /> communities. It should be noted that many communities have a lower density range. Staff is currently in <br /> discussion with our Metropolitan Council Sector Representative to understand this. <br /> Density Transitioning: <br /> At the January Planning Commission meeting, staff presented pictures of where the current standard of <br /> transitioning between urban and rural densities posed some challenges, especially regarding ownership of buffer <br /> outlots and to over-planting trees. Feedback from the Commission was that there should not be this type of <br /> transitioning done between the same uses--single-family. The consensus was that there should be transitioning or <br />