My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Council - 02/14/2006
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Council
>
2006
>
Agenda - Council - 02/14/2006
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/19/2025 2:57:10 PM
Creation date
2/10/2006 1:25:47 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Council
Document Date
02/14/2006
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
363
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Education/Potential Partnerships · Department of Employment and Economic Development (DEED) <br /> · Central Minnesota Development Company (CMDC) <br /> · Chamber of Commerce <br /> · Ramsey Rotary <br /> · Ramsey Lions Club <br /> · Anoka County Partners <br /> <br />Motion by Member Steffen, seconded by Member Gromberg, to adopt the 2006 work plan as <br />amended above. <br /> <br />Motion carried. Voting Yes: Chairperson Riley, Members Steffen, Gromberg, Kiefer, <br />LeTourneau, and Strommen. Voting No: None. Absent: Member Elvig. <br /> <br />Case #3: Business Prospects <br /> <br />Economic Development/TIF Specialist Sullivan stated staff has identified two prospects to <br />develop in the City of Ramsey. The first candidate is a machine shop that would like to develop <br />the former Amie Cox Property. The second prospect is a rigging company that would like to <br />develop the parcel south of Bury and Carlson. Both projects will create high paying jobs, <br />substantial growth potential and some industry diversity to Ramsey. He explained the intent of <br />this discussion is to get input and insight from the EDA as to whether these businesses would be <br />good selections. He advised these negotiations are preliminary and there are discussions <br />regarding roads and street extensions relating to the parcel south of Bury and Carlson. <br /> <br />The Board discussed account diversity, tax impacts, job creation, and growth potential in relation <br />to the selection of the businesses. Economic DevelopmentfrlF Specialist Sullivan advised the <br />businesses meet the City's requirements in relation to these factors. <br /> <br />Economic Development/I'IF Specialist Sullivan advised one other thing to take into <br />consideration is whether to wait to develop the Amie .Cox Property with other properties that <br />may redevelop in the area as a plan, rather than to piecemeal the redevelopment as things occur. <br />The consensus of the Board was that the City should not continue to own the property while <br />waiting for possible redevelopment to occur. <br /> <br />Member Kiefer stressed the need to target a diverse type of businesses. He commented the City <br />has a lot of machine shop type businesses, and many of these businesses are moving to China. <br />The City may be setting itself up as a depressed area if there is not enough diversification in its <br />businesses. Economic Development/TIF Specialist Sullivan indicated diversification is factored <br />in with business selections. He noted in the past year Wildlife Research and Harber Industries <br />located within the City. <br /> <br />Member Gromberg noted the buildings being constructed in the City are versatile and will <br />accommodate multiple uses. <br /> <br /> Economic Development Authority/January 11, 2006 <br /> Page 4 of 6 <br />-40- <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.