My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Minutes - Council - 10/10/2000
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Minutes
>
Council
>
2000
>
Minutes - Council - 10/10/2000
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/25/2025 2:05:09 PM
Creation date
5/22/2003 3:23:15 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Type
Council
Document Date
10/10/2000
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
17
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
City Engineer Olson replied that he was CO1TeCt and noted that it has taken almost six months for <br />staff to research all the businesses. <br /> <br />Mr. Vevea inquired as to how the City could determine that gravel is impervious. <br /> <br />City Engineer Olson explained that when a compacted gravel driveway is compared to an <br />undisturbed area in a large storm, there will be more water soaked-in in the undisturbed area. <br />That is why the City chose to include any gravel area that would produce runoff. He explained <br />that whenever an assumption is made there are certain inequities that are made. Mr. Olson <br />advised Mr. Vevea to come in and meet with staff to review the numbers that were used to <br />calculate the fee for Ve-Ve, Inc. <br /> <br />Robert Dillon inquired as to how the railroad is required to pay for the' storm drainage utility. <br /> <br />City Engineer Olson replied that currently the railroad pays nothing. <br /> <br />Mt'. Dillon replied that they have impervious area and the railroad acts as a dam. <br /> <br />City Engineer Olson replied that he agreed with Mr. Dillon, but also noted that the railroad <br />ditches are used quite frequently. <br /> <br />Gray Reimann stated that he listened to the last Council meeting regarding the same issue and <br />what the businesses are requesting is to be treated fairly. He explained that a quarter acre <br />residential property is being assessed $6.30 and anything north of 153rd is a larger lot than ¼ <br />acre. His lot is 3-½ acres and to be fair they should charge residents for the amount of land they <br />have. <br /> <br />Councihnember Hendriksen replied that the average residential lot typically has a house, <br />driveway, and garage, with the worse case scenario being all of those on a quarter-acre lot. If <br />anything, those homeowners who have larger lots should pay less. <br /> <br />Mr. Reimann stated that if the fees are all determined by the same formula then everyone should <br />pay the same for the same amount of acreage. <br /> <br />Councilmember Hendriksen replied that the formula includes the amount of runoff that is <br />produced by each property. <br /> <br />Mr. Reilnann stated that'the City upgraded his road four years ago and when the road grade was <br />changed, all of the water from the road now comes onto his property. He stated that he is fine <br />with that, but now he is receiving an assessment for the City. Mr. Reimann stated that the issue <br />should be put on hold and revisited. <br /> <br />City Council/October 10, 2000 <br /> Page 7 of 17 <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.