My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Public Works Committee - 02/21/2006
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Public Works Committee
>
2000 - 2009
>
2006
>
Agenda - Public Works Committee - 02/21/2006
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/13/2025 2:31:24 PM
Creation date
2/22/2006 11:50:49 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Public Works Committee
Document Date
02/21/2006
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
21
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Assistant Public Works Director Olson replied this community has one of the most restrictive <br />City Codes in relation to light pollution. The code includes 100% full cutoff, which means there <br />is not a light glare from the outside, and the lights are blocked and shielded to shine down. <br /> <br />Chairperson Elvig suggested lighting improvement estimates be prepared, one estimate for <br />medium density and one estimate for larger lots. <br /> <br />Assistant Public Works Director Olson indicated the light spacing guideline is every 300 feet for <br />urban subdivisions. Currently everyone that pays subdivision light fees are consistent, as they <br />are urban subdivisions with a number of lots to spread that 300 feet over. He requested direction <br />on whether this spacing should remain consistent or spread out depending on the subdivision. <br />He explained operating and maintenance costs are paid per light, not per unit. <br /> <br />Councilmember Cook stated the light spacing should remain consistent. Owners of larger lots <br />should be informed upfront that the cost is based on the operation of the light and will result in a <br />higher cost per unit for larger lots. <br /> <br />Chairperson Elvig commented very few of the City's trails are on roads, and some now go <br />through subdivisions. He suggested the City may want to take some initiative on lighting these <br />trails that are not lit. <br /> <br />Councilmember Cook commented another problem could be created by lighting these trails, <br />which invites people to utilize them after dark. He suggested there may be appropriate trails for <br />lighting, such as designated recreational loops. <br /> <br />The consensus of the Committee was to recommend that the City Council direct staff to draft a <br />subdivision street lighting policy, obtaining input from the Park Board regarding the lighting of <br />trails within the City. <br /> <br />Case #2 Review Priority Street Lighting <br /> <br />City Engineer Jankowski explained that the City has been pursuing the establishment of a <br />priority street lighting on the higher speed roadways within the City since 1991. The goal of this <br />program is to provide lighting at intersections on high speed roads for the purpose of enhancing <br />driving safety on these roadways as stated in the attached policy. The City is now approaching <br />the completion of the priority light system through the installation of street lights at the <br />remaining unlit intersections. At the present time there are approximately 150 priority <br />intersections which have lighting and another 24 eligible locations without lighting. A list of <br />these intersections is included in the Committee's packet. It should be noted that six of these <br />locations might be considered for elimination from having priority street lights installed based <br />upon the situation described on the list. In addition the City had received a request from a <br />resident in 2003 to have the intersection at Variolite Street and 158th Avenue removed from the <br />list. The City Council decided at that time to install the light at this intersection as one of the last <br />priority lights in the system. <br /> <br />Public Works Committee / January 17, 2006 <br /> Page 5 of 14 <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.