My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Council - 09/27/1988
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Council
>
1988
>
Agenda - Council - 09/27/1988
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/8/2025 12:27:55 PM
Creation date
2/24/2006 9:46:35 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Council
Document Date
09/27/1988
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
160
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Leachate <br /> <br />Page 76 indicates that the steeper slopes are projected to decrease <br />the rate of percolation with the proposed final cover by eight to 10 <br />percent over the same cover at currently approved grades. The EIS <br />further indicates "that a net increase in the volume of leachate <br />generated during the implementation of the vertical expansion will <br />occur". This hardly seems prudent when compared to other <br />alternatives. The EIS indicates that the planned flow barrier system <br />should take care of these volumes with a lifetime net reduction. <br /> <br />The proposer, according to the EIS, is looking at a schedule for <br />placing final cover as the site is brought to proposed grades. The <br />EIS further indicates that the cover placement will take two years and <br />be completed in 1991 and concludes "Therefore, the length of time to <br />complete final cover placement may not be extended by implementation <br />of the vertical expansion." <br /> <br />This can only be true if the expansion and capacity limits are time <br />restricted rather than volume permitted. Concurrent with this <br />process, WMMI is seeking a CUP from Ramsey. W~MI through that process <br />is not indicating an expansion period of 2.5 years but has indicated <br />that they need at least five years. <br /> <br />The additional time would also contribute to leachate production as <br />well as create other adverse impacts on the Community's development <br />schedule and extend the burden of an operating landfill on residents <br />of the Community. <br /> <br />Economic Impacts <br /> <br />The EIS presented data addressing the impacts on market values of <br />residential properties and we believe erroneously concludes that "the <br />landfill appears to have no adverse impact on residential property <br />valuation." The sampling was done on a very limited basis and list <br />versus sales price or sales versus assessed values may not necessarily <br />be the best barometers to assess impacts on property values. The city <br />Assessor's office trys to assess all residential improved properties <br />at approximately 93-95% of market value. Thus, all properties should <br />sell at a "premium" to assessed value, similarly, the potential sales <br />price typically is taken into consideration prior to a property <br />listing. Thus, a significant variation in selling vs. listing price <br />shouldn't be reflected. <br /> <br />In the April 30, 1988 study of "socio~economic Impacts of Regional <br />Landfills on Host Communities", area realtors expressed several <br />difficulties in selling properties near the landfill. These ranged <br />from lower listing prices to eliminating portions of the market from <br />even considering a house near the landfill. Thus, "no adverse impact" <br />conclusion is, at best, speculative in the EIS. <br /> <br />4 <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.