10/27/88 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

PROPOSED FINDINGS OF PACT ~. STEVE COtfPTON 1. That Hr. Steve Co~pton, hereinafter referred to as "Applicant", has properly applied for a Board of Adjustment Variance from Section 170.015G of the City Code. 2. That the Applicant appeared before the Board of Adjustment for a public hearing pursuant to Section I?0.013G of the City Code on October 2?, 1988 and that said publlc hearing was properly advertised and that the minutes of said public hearing are hereby incorporated as a part of these findings by reference. 3. That the subject property is generally known as 7250 166th Avenue N.W. and is'legally described as follows: That part of the west 225 feet of the east 675 feet (as measured along the north line) of the southeast quarter of the southeast quarter of Section 9, Tc~nshlp 32, Range 25, lying north of a llne bearing south 89 degrees 14 minutes 32 seconds vest from a point in the east line of said southeast quarter of southeast quarter distant 523.3 feet north of the southeast corner thereof the south line of said southeast quarter of southeast quarter is assumed to bear due east and west (subject to road easement over the south 33 feet thereof) (subject to easement of record). 4. That the subject property is located in the R-1R Residential District and is approximately 4 acres in size. 5. That the Applicant is requesting a variance from Section 170.015G of the City Code in order to construct a garage 80 feet nearer the front lot line than the principal structure on the lot. 6. That Section 170.015G of the City Code specifies that no accessory structure shall be constructed nearer the front lot line than the principal structure. 7. That there are exceptional conditions applying to the property that do not generally apply to other properties in the district. Namely, that the placement of an accessory structure on the subject property is limited by wetlands, varying topograhy, mature tree grOwth and on-site septic system. 8. That the Applicant has stated that such a variance is necessary for the preservation of a substautial property right similar to that possessed by other properties in the area. 9. That the exceptional conditions (wetlands, varying topography, :ature tree growth and on-site septic system) do not result from the acticns of the Applicant.