09/08/88 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

PROPOSED FINDINGS OF FACT 1~. JOBN NOARD 1. That Mr. John Noard, hereinafter referred to as "Applicant", has properly applied for a conditional use permit to have an advertising sign. 2. That the Applicant c~/e~rcC ~efcrc~ the lltr~:irg ~rC Zcr~rL Cc~sion for a 1.uLx*c Lc~:~L ][~zrL t( Ctct~cL~ 17C.C12D a~d 170.05 cf the City Code on ££ptcmber $, 19S~ and that said public hearing was properly advertised and that the minutes of said public hearing are hereby incorporated as part of these findings by reference. 3. That the subject property is generally kn~'n as 6760 M~. ~10 ~.W. and is legally described as Lot 1, Block 1, ~iveraide West, Anoka County, Minneaota 4. /%~at the subject property ia located in the B-1 Business District and is approximately 1.3 acres in size. 5. That the subject property abutts three streets. 6. That the Applicant is requesting a conditional use permit to construct a ~00 square foot advertising sign on the subject property. 7. That Section 170.05 of the City Code permits advertising signs up to 350 square feet. However, Section 170.05 of the City Code also states that conditional use permits are required for all advertising signs. 8. That the Applicant reviewed the proposed signage with the Plmnning Commission at the time of site plan review for the facility on the subject property. 9. That Section 170.05 of the City Code permits one identification ~ign, not to exceed 100 square feet, on any commercially used property. 10. That Section 170.05 of the City Code allows one free standing advertising sign per street frontage on the site. I1. That the proposed advertising sign will be constructed on the northwest corner of the subject property. 12. That the Applicant has stated that such variance is necessary to properly advertise the facility and products offered c=n tko subjact property. 13. That if granted, the variance will not gr~.~t t~e f~!ic:.rt ~tecial privileges tket are denied by the City Code to other properties in the commercial area. 14. 15.