Laserfiche WebLink
BLADHOLM BROS. - CUP FOR DEMOLITION LANDFILL <br /> <br />By: Merland Otto, Acting Zoning Administrator <br /> <br /> The proposed demolition landfill site is situated on a 13.3 acre site <br /> all of which is zoned I-1 (Industrial). Our review of the pro- <br /> posal raises several concerns. Among the most significant are <br /> whether the proposed use is consistent with the City's comprehen- <br /> sive plan as well as operational concerns. <br /> <br /> Consistency with Comprehensive Plan~ <br /> <br /> The City's comprehensive plan indicates that sewer and water <br /> ultimately would be extended through the site (Exhibits A and B). <br /> The Highway 10 Corridor Study also proposed a frontage road through <br /> the site. The construction costs of locating this infrastructure <br /> through a demolition landfill would increase significantly due to <br /> obstructions, additional excavation and potential settlement problems. <br /> <br /> Further, nearly half of the proposed landfill site has been <br /> recommended to be acquired for airport property. Should the City <br /> proceed with ' <br /> acquisition, purchase of a demolition landfill site would <br /> not be in the City's best interest. <br /> <br />As the Commission is aware, the City has only a finite amount of <br />commercial and industrial property with Highway 10 frontage. These <br />properties would normally be considered prime for the type of <br />development which the City wishes to encourage. It appears <br />inconsistent with City plans to take existing developable land out of <br />this pool and convert it to landfill status. <br /> <br />~Derational Concerns <br /> <br /> The proposed filling operation indicates a vertical use of airspace of <br /> approximately seven feet. This is an inefficient use of space <br /> relative to the land area involved since it uses a large surface area <br /> for a relatively small volume of demolition. <br /> <br />~roduction figures are estimated with a potential for a significant <br />Increase dependent on whether or not the applicant expands its <br />production line. However, at current waste production rates, the fill <br />would have a capacity to accomodate nearly S5 years of waste <br />production. <br /> <br />Pollution/contamination of ground water should be of minimal concern <br />,assuming concrete and reinforcing steel are the only components. <br />Cells are sufficiently above the water table. <br /> <br />Win~.and water erosion as well as dust control is of concern. The <br />~{~an} ne~ds to provlde more specifics on ce!l closure and re- <br />~am±isnmen~ of vegetative cover. <br /> <br /> <br />