Laserfiche WebLink
20. That the proposed grading plan will result in a substantial loss <br /> of trees. <br /> <br />Motion carried. <br />LaDue and Terry. <br />and Shumway. <br /> <br />Voting Yes: <br />Voting No: <br /> <br />Chairman Zimmerman, Commissionera Hendriksen, <br />None. Absent: Commissioners Howell, Holm <br /> <br />Motion by Commissioner Terry and seconded by Commissioner Hendriksen to <br />recommend that City Council adopt the proposed findings of fact, as <br />amended, relating to Mr. David Schulte's request for a conditional use <br />permit. <br /> <br />Motion carried. <br />LaDue and Terry. <br />and Shumway. <br /> <br />Voting Yes: <br />Voting No: <br /> <br />Chairman Zimmerman, Commissioners Hendriksen, <br />None. Absent: Commissioners Howell, Holm <br /> <br />Motion by Commissioner Hendriksen and seconded by Commissioner LaDue to <br />recommend that Item ~3 of the proposed conditional use permit be amended <br />as follows: <br /> <br />All grading and excavating shall be limited to 100,000 cubic <br />yards. Subcut below final proposed grade shall be made only for <br />the purpose of soil correction and minor adjustment of subgrade <br />prior to application of the topsoil layer to final proposed grade. <br /> <br />Motion carried. <br />LaDue and Terry. <br />and Shumway. <br /> <br />Voting Yes: <br />Voting No: <br /> <br />Chairman Zimmerman, Commissioners Hendriksen, <br />None. Absent: Commissioners Howell, Holm <br /> <br />Motion by Commissioner Hendriksen and seconded by Commissioner LaDue to <br />recommend that City Council approve Mr. David Schnlte's request for a <br />conditional use permit, as amended. <br /> <br />Motion carried. <br />LaDue and Terry. <br />and Shumway. <br /> <br />Voting Yes: <br />Voting No: <br /> <br />Chairman Zimmerman, Commissioners Hendriksen, <br />None. Absent: Commissioners Howell, Holm <br /> <br />Case ~)1; Reouest For ConceD: Rev{ew Of Development Plmnc Case Of <br /> North Fork. Inc.: <br /> <br />Dennis Peck was present representing North Fork, Inc. to review the <br />proposed concept for development of the remainder of Northfork P.U.D. Mr. <br />Peck updated the Commission as to the development of Northfork P.U.D. thus <br />far, including construction of roads and Hwy. ~10 access with railroad <br />crossing and park dedication. Mr. Peck reviewed the concept for the <br />remainder of the development including lots and a golf course. Mr. Peck <br />stated that he will be attending a meeting of the Park Commission to work <br />out the details of that port'oh of the multi-use trail system passing <br />through Northfork. <br /> <br />Case ~; Reouest For Discussion C~ Accesses To Pro~ertv~ Case Of Mr. <br /> Darre]! Reynolds: <br /> <br />Planning and Zoning Commission/September 19, 1988 <br /> <br />Page 5 of 7 <br /> <br /> <br />