10/04/88 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

Mr. Gerald Zimmerman Page 2 September 30, 1988 5. B-1 Business District Zoning specifies a setback of 35 feet for the rear yard. In this case with Highway 10 frontage, the applicant contends that the area behind the building should be viewed as a sideyard (setback would be 20'). The site plan shows a setback of 12 feet from the east side of the lot. The setback would need to be corrected or a variance would have to be granted. 6. City Code 170.D15F requires the finished lot grade elevation of all buildings to be a minimum of 18 inches above the centerline grade of the adjacent public roadway. The grading plan indicates a slab elevation of 865. 7. The applicant's estimated water usage appears to be excessive and should be re-evaluated for design of the septic system (see attached letter). Particular attention needs to be given to stormwater runoff and holding for this property. A drainage easement may be required dependent on submittal of final grading plans. The building information and preliminary plans appear to be consistent with the intent of City Ordinances. The applicant will require a CUP for the proposed advertising sign. 10. No soil borings or perc tests have been conducted as yet. The applicant has indicated that final plans would be submitted contingent upon city approvals. All final plans must be certified by an architect er engineer. The applicant has indicated that, if approved, he intends to start construction next spring. Recommendation: We recommend tabling action on this l~em until such time that traffic concerns and site drainage have been sufficiently addressed. Sincerely, HAKANSON ANDERSON ASSOCIATES~, INC. Mer~nd Otto /mlc File: RA2:15-67