Laserfiche WebLink
3) Of course, as in all things there is a negative side too. <br />First, no matter who owns the site, it will always be in Ramsey and com- <br />plaints will almost always start with us, and then work to the top. For <br />any substantial dollars to come to Ramsey through a County takeover, the <br />South 80 acres would almost have to be developed into a landfill site. <br />In such development in the best interests of the citizens of Ramsey, could <br />Ramsey gain more by fighting it out with Anoka, take our changes on winning <br />or losing and perhaps operate the site on our own? I am certain each of <br />you have different answers to these questions. <br /> <br /> 4) The PCA has expressed some reservation about the feasibility <br />of a landfill on the South 80 acres. ~At this point, it appears the reser-~ <br />vation is more from a standpoint of not having adequate or sufficient infor- <br />mation than a final environmental decision. Of course, if the PCA does <br />finally conclude that the site is unacceptable all of the above is moot. <br /> <br /> 5) On August 19 the PCA is conducting hearings on the Ramsey site <br />and perhaps others. The Council may want to take a position at this hearing <br />of at least advising the PCA that Ramsey has yet to take a position on the <br />South 80 and until such a position is taken, the Council would like to see <br />this site remain on the County's landfill site inventory list. <br /> <br /> 6) With regard to the lawsuit preparation and discussion with <br />the County and City of Anoka, it is becoming more and more important for <br />Ramsey to take a position on its desires for the future of the South 80 <br />acres. <br /> <br />WKG:sb <br /> <br /> <br />