My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Council - 07/28/1981
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Council
>
1981
>
Agenda - Council - 07/28/1981
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/15/2025 1:39:18 PM
Creation date
2/28/2006 9:13:18 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Council
Document Date
07/28/1981
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
357
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
1RnHttl � squirr lrattgv . <br />® 1222 PIONEER BUIlDINO 5T. PAUL MINNE80TA 55101 <br />• (512) 224.2840 • <br />July 9, 1981 <br />City of Ramsey <br />City Hall <br />15153 Now Then Boulevard <br />Ramsey, Minnesota 553 <br />Attention( Planning Commission and <br />City Council <br />In ret Preliminary Plat - James/Marx Estates <br />• Dear Members of the Planning Commission and City Council <br />At the Planning Board hearing held on July 7th, the Planning Board requi <br />that we file a sub- division of what is shown as Out Lot A on the plat. We <br />did so at their request eTmtssion w a s <br />to bui dmthenclinic on the , <br />property just <br />Anderson when he su division sought in this preliminary Plat. We have <br />North of the p sub plan and that it is not binding on <br />we do not <br />noted our serious objections to such a p <br />anyone, and we want to make sure that everyone I d h� come up for hearing <br />approve of a road Co uncil and and in thepmeantime•efforts x111 be made with lat plan <br />before the City <br />eer that a joint driveway wi <br />regard to the suggestion by the City Engin <br />Dr. Anderson and Austin be considered, inasmuch as the Plat Plan shows that <br />their temporary driveway is practically on the line of the new planned sub- <br />division. <br />• It is our fond hope that the rest of whe w r � water is <br />dev vvailable. The <br />pl unit development, esp ces o Highway se w er e5 is because xe felt, after <br />reason for not showing any which would pour <br />review by Dr. Marx himself, that such <br />to Fast of and With Plans for a <br />out of the development that occurred than simply a drive <br />e o f traffic new school, would create much morJamesaRefrigerationnd I assume we will dis- <br />In to the planned development by but the purpose of this letter is <br />cuss this matter at the July 28th meeting, l that and we do is si <br />to let you know that the sketched p i t t hexceptftoeindicateply <br />to you that it had <br />not anticipate or wish to be bound not is not binding on anybody as to any <br />been a compliance with an or dinan c e <br />plan that is filed. <br />Sincerely Yours, <br />On Behalf of James; Marx <br />ROYAL ESQUIRE REALTY / <br />Alfred <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.