Laserfiche WebLink
-16- <br />Figure 8 illustrates the portion of the annual debt <br />service payments which could be cancelled and • <br />refinanced by exercising the early call option. - <br />b. Proposals for Refunding of Existing Callable Bonds <br />The existing debt payment schedules have required. generally <br />increasing amounts of funding from 1971 ($14.6 million) to <br />1982 ($19.4 million). In 1985 and 1986 still higher debt <br />service revenues are required ($22.5 million and $21.6 <br />million respectively). The debt service funding needs of <br />the 1981 to 1986 Development Program, designed to overlay <br />the existing debt, will raise the total annual revenue <br />needs. <br />For purposes of this' study, the Council staff has reviewed <br />some refinancing options which are available to the Council <br />and the MWCC by reason of the early call features which are <br />designed into the existing bond issues. An interest rate of <br />nine percent was used in the calculations. <br />The first option requires that $34.8 million of the issue <br />dated October 1, 1975 ($50.9 million) be called on January 1, <br />1985. A new bond issue in the amount of $34 million would <br />have a longer retirement schedule, thus reducing the high <br />amounts of revenues needed in the years 1986 and following. <br />From 1986 to 1989 the average annual reduction would be 24.7 <br />percent. This would provide a lower base of revenue needs fo_l_. <br />existing debt before the new development program borrowing is <br />superimposed. <br />The second option would involve calling all of the out- <br />standing Council /MWCC bonds, $62.43 million. A refunding <br />issue of $62 million would require lesser revenues for five <br />years beginning in 1984. The average annual reduction would <br />be 23.2 percent. <br />The third option requires calling the remaining Council /MWCC <br />bonds and those issues of the assumed debt which exceed an <br />interest rate of six percent. A total of $71.07 million in <br />debt would be refinanced by $70.6 million in new borrowing, <br />providing an average annual reduction of 24.1 percent for <br />the years 1984 to 1988. The issue dates and amounts and the <br />call dates and amounts of the bond issues concerned are <br />shown in Table 5. <br />The difference between the three options is the amount of <br />bonds called, therefore, the amount of reduction in the <br />annual revenues required for the years 1984 to 1988. <br />Table 6 shows the existing revenue needs for existing debt <br />service and the needs as they are estimated to be for each <br />of the options discussed above. <br />