Laserfiche WebLink
- 11- <br /> <br />BANS <br />Bans can be used to eliminate solid waste that creates waste man- <br />agement problems. Such product controls can generally be applied <br />only if alternative products and materials exist. For example, <br />the Minnesota Legislature has banned nonreturnable plastic milk <br />containers because they were deemed to pose a major waste prob- <br />lem. Bans on certain kinds of tires and packaging may lead to a <br /> reduction in solid waste generation. <br /> <br />EXTENDED WARRANTIES <br />Warranties on durable goods could be extended for a specified <br />length of time to reduce the flow into the solid waste stream. <br />The EPA has determined that if all autOs and trucks were sold with <br />radial-ply tires, the solid waste stream would be reduced by <br />0.7 percent (EPA, 1975). Minnesota could facilitate this waste <br />reduction technique by requiring.a.40,900 mile wa{~anty on jew <br />tires sold in Minnesota and provldlng incentives (rot example, <br />deposits) for tire recapping. Since little literature is avail- <br />able, it is difficult to judge the waste impact of other warranty <br />programs. <br /> <br />NEWSPRINT CONSERVATION <br />Newsprint conservation is accomplished through thinner paper and <br />changes in printing format. The American Paper Institute has <br />reported that newsprint weighing five percent less than common <br />newsprint has performed satisfactorily (EPA, 1977). Also, chang- <br />ing the standard six-column printing format to eight columns for <br />news and nine columns for advertising could reduce current usage <br />by five percent (EPA, 1975). <br />Based on MPCA estimates, if both forms of newsprint conservation <br />were used in Minnesota, about 20,000 tons of waste could be pre- <br />vented annually. This represents about 0.7 percent of the munic- <br />ipal solid waste stream (MPCA, 1979). <br /> <br />MULCHING OF GRASS CLIPPINGS <br />Mulching involves mowing or trimming of lawns in such a way that <br />the grass clippings are reduced to a fine mulch and left on the <br />lawn. No raking or gathering is required, and thus no addition of <br />clippings to the solid waste stream. The advantages of this are a <br />decreased waste volume and an increase of nutrient flow back to <br />the mowed lawn. However, there are some disadvantages with this <br />technique. They include increased risk of lawn diseases, weed <br />problems, the increased possibility of insect pests and increased <br />layer of thatch. <br /> Based on EPA estimates (1975) yard waste makes up 17.4 percent of <br /> the total solid waste stream. From this it is estimated that <br /> grass clippings represent about three to five percent of the <br /> total. <br /> <br /> <br />