Laserfiche WebLink
- 15 - <br /> <br />actions), but receive significantly higher participation and <br />recovery rates. Although the demographic and market conditions <br />for these two programs differ from those of the Twin cities <br />Metropolitan Area, they serve as examples of the potentials from <br />well-run curb-side programs. <br /> <br />Source-separated organics can be collected from citizens who sepa- <br />rate solid wastes and nonrecyclable paper from other components of <br />solid waste. Source separated organics provide an excellent feed <br />stock for composting since the material is relatively free of <br />glass, metal and plastics that reduce the value of the final com- <br />post product. Approximately 8,000 people in Portland, Oregon, <br />currently participate in such a program. Residents place food <br />waste and other organics in plastic pails with sealable tops. The <br />pails are then taken to a site where the organics are composted. <br />When the compost is ready, area citizens use the compost for <br /> <br />gardening. <br />There are several examples of successful composting operations <br /> <br />currently in progress within the Region. Hennepin County and <br />St. Paul operate leaf composting sites as a free service to the <br />public. Leaves are deposited in the fall and compost mulch is <br />available for pickup in the spring. The City of Roseville pro- <br />vides free curb-side leaf pickup service for residents, using <br />specialized vacuum trucks. Roseville's municipal composting site <br />is also available for drop-off and pickup similar to the St. Paul <br />and Hennepin operations. Statewide leaf recycling programs handle <br />about nine percent of all yard waste generated (MPCA, 1979). The <br />Metropolitan Waste Control Commission has also been windrowing <br />filter cake sewage sludge from its Metro plant and reports excel- <br />lent success and more-tha~-adequate market demand for the compost <br />product. In general, composting has excellent potential as an <br />alternative to landfilling organic wastes, depending on final <br />product quality and market demand. <br /> <br />Yard waste, on the average, represents 17.4 percent of the total <br />waste stream by volume, depending on the season. Some haulers <br />contend that, in Minnesota, yard waste can increase the volume of <br />waste during spring and fall by as much as 50 percent. Since curb- <br />side leaf programs don't require citizens to bag or box yard <br />waste, a high participation rate may be anticipated from a well- <br />run program. Based on recovery rate results of other programs, it <br />is reasonable to assume that a 30 percent recovery rate could be <br />achieved for yard waste through a combined curb-site pickup and <br />backyard composting campaign. Therefore, yard waste recycling has <br />the potential to reduce the solid waste stream by four to five <br />percent. <br /> <br />PICKING <br /> <br />Picking, or salvaging, is the process of removing valuable <br />materials from the mixed waste stream for later sale or reuse. <br />Picking is typically an unstructured materials recovery system <br />that can occur at any point along the collection and disposal <br />route. Frequency of picking activities and recovery rates <br />directly correspond to the materials' market prices. <br /> <br /> <br />