My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Council - 11/25/1980
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Council
>
1980
>
Agenda - Council - 11/25/1980
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/15/2025 2:08:01 PM
Creation date
2/28/2006 11:35:58 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Council
Document Date
11/25/1980
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
309
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
- 48 - <br /> <br />Table 4 indicates that about 2.8 percent of the waste stream is food waste <br />produced from food processors and canners. This is a presorted organic <br />feedstock, which is readily available for composting, methane or alcohol <br />recovery systems. Therefore, the manufacturing food waste objectives <br />reflect an immediate dependence on source separation of this material. <br />Residential and commercial food waste, however, is not ordinarily sepa- <br />rated from other materials and would be difficult to recover through <br />recycling techniques. However, the high energy content of this signifi- <br />cant portion of the waste stream lends itself to high-technology mixed <br />waste recovery. <br /> <br />Table 6 indicates that about 56 to 75 percent of the Region's waste should <br />be handled by high-technology systems by the year 2000. Most of the sig- <br />nificant facilities should be on line and fully operational by 1990. Fig- <br />ure 2 represents a summary of the waste separation and resource recovery <br />objectives. Although the values were based on objectives for specific <br />materials as shown in Tables 5 and 6, the total waste stream impact of <br />these two strategy categories were summarized in Figure 2 to illustrate <br />the priority of abatement strategies. The objectives for waste separa- <br />tion, 12 to 16 percent, were established first and then the balance (up to <br />about 90 percent) was allocated to resource recovery systems (56 to 75 per- <br />cent). This results in a range of unprocessed waste being landfilled of <br />about nine to 32 percent of the net waste stream by the year 2000. <br /> <br />Table 7 summarizes these projections, along with the other two strategy <br />categories: waste reduction and source separation. It is evident that, at <br />this time, without any new legislative actions, waste reduction will play <br />only a minor role in the total regional management system. Nonetheless, <br />the mulching of grass clippings and public education strategies are still <br />important and deserve careful consideration and planning. This is espe- <br />cially true since public participation and awareness will be essential for <br />many of the source separation strategies and important for the general <br />acceptance of high-technology system costs. <br /> <br />Waste processing (shredding and baling) may play a significant role during <br />the interim period before high-technology development. If 30 percent of <br />our Region's landfill capacity were used in combination with shredding and' <br />balin~ equipment, it is reasonable to project up to an 18-percent total <br />impact by the year 1985, assuming a 60-percent volume reduction. It may <br />be reasonable to project that these landfill shredders could be replaced <br />by shredding equipment at the centralized resource recovery facilities by <br />the year 1990. <br /> <br />An ideal,'comprehensive system for solid waste management should include <br />elements of all four abatement categories. However, even under an ideal <br />system, there will always be some remaining residue that cannot be recov- <br />ered and must be landfilled. It is also important to note that, although <br />these systems can complement each other, they may sometimes compete for <br />the same materials. For instance, paper can be either recycled into new <br />paper, burned for its energy content, or shredded and composted with other <br />organics. Therefore, management decisions concerning these various strate- <br />gies should consider the best use of the materials and efficiencies of the <br />entire system. If facility planning includes careful examination of alter- <br />native recovery systems, over-design and cost overruns can be avoided <br />through comprehensive management plans that include all feasible <br />strategies. <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.