My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Council - 10/28/1980
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Council
>
1980
>
Agenda - Council - 10/28/1980
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/15/2025 2:07:20 PM
Creation date
2/28/2006 11:56:52 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Council
Document Date
10/28/1980
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
257
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
TO: City Administrator <br />FROM; Building Official <br />RE; Moved in storage building <br />DATE; October 24, 1980 <br />Attached please find a copy of a building permit application and a site <br />plan for a storage building Mr. Cox wishes to place on his property located <br />on Sunfish Lake Blvd. This building is presently located in the City of <br />Anoka where Mr. Cox previously had his place of business and obviously <br />acceptable at that location. <br />City ordinance would require that Mr Cox take the following steps: <br />1) Apply for a building permit. <br />2) Pay $100.00 to have the building inspected. <br />3) Receive Council approval if the building meets code. <br />4) Comply with the Cities proposed site and design plan <br />ordinance, <br />Inasmuch as I am familiar with the building in question and Mr. Cox's present <br />operation, it would be my recommendation that the City Council approve his re- <br />quest to relocate this building to his present place of business. <br />I would further recommend the following: <br />1) That the requirements of the proposed site <br />em a n d s design o plan <br />ordinance be waived in view of the imp <br />has continued making at his place of business. <br />2) That the i ts ection e waived as it will not be <br />necessary P to <br />In the future, thatawouldaallow staffrtohhandle smalllprojectsasuch as some <br />so this City <br />so as not t to burden Council agendas with triviiovaltofrtheirepeersrto avoid <br />Council members who should example of <br />that this ispa temporary structure, 20 x 20, <br />any misunderstandings. An sxamp <br />thhat Waste Management wishes to place at the landfill in conjunction with <br />their methane gas recovery program. I feel an item such as this should not <br />have to go through a site and design plan review. Its a temporary type of <br />type of policy <br />structure, according to Waste Management, which is smaller than the average <br />double garage to be located on 80 acres of land. <br />For_whatever its worth, this is my opinion on this matter. <br />CRB :sb / <br />.D 3 w <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.