Agenda - Council - 03/14/2023 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

approval of it. They did note that they wanted to make sure that there would not be overcrowding of trees between the buildings and public roads. Staff has noted that the Landscape Plan should or could be revised to eliminate the proposed trees between the sidewalks and buildings or possibly relocate some of them to the interior greenspace. This would retain the boulevard tree plantings, which is in line with what the Design Framework emphasizes. Architecture There has been much discussion with the Planning Commission regarding the architecture for this project. Initially, in March of 2022, there was discussion about front porches versus covered patios. When the Sketch Plan was reviewed, Staff recommended, and the Planning Commission supported, adding stone or brick elements to the fronts and sides of the buildings facing a public road. This recommendation was based on the significant emphasis on architecture within the Design Framework. More specifically, the Design Framework states that a greater emphasis should be given to architectural elements, materials, and design features for buildings that face or front parks and that architecture is to be '4-sided' at all locations visible from public areas (e.g. public streets). Based on the greater emphasis on architecture within The COR, coupled with the fact that this project also overlooks The Draw, Staff and the Planning Commission recommend the addition of brick and/or stone elements on the fronts and sides of buildings facing a public road. At the Public Hearing, the Applicant stated that they are not opposed to the enhanced architecture being recommended by Staff. They had noted when this project was initially being discussed almost a year ago, construction prices were much higher than today, which was a factor in not including brick or stone on any of the elevations. The Applicant stated that they could look at incorporating enhanced features on the public -facing sides of buildings, but were hoping for some flexibility should the material prices skyrocket again. Subsequently, the Applicant has provided updated elevations that do include brickwork on the fronts of buildings and informed Staff that this enhancement might increase the per unit cost by $2,500 to $5,000. Np brick is shown on the side elevations, however. The Planning Commission held a Public Hearing on February 23, 2023 and reviewed the Preliminary Plat. There were no written or verbal comments received regarding the project. The Planning Commission supported the project contingent upon enhancing the exterior finish of the buildings facing a public street with brick or stone elements. Alternatives Alternative L• Motion to adopt Resolution #23-042 approving the Preliminary Plat contingent upon adding brick and/or stone finishes to all sides of buildings that face a public road (this would include the fronts and one side of multiple buildings) in accordance with the COR Design Framework. Aside from the architecture, the proposed Preliminary Plat generally complies with the standards of the Design Framework, with minor revisions needed as noted in the Staff review comments. The Planning Commission and Staff support this alternative. Alternative 2: Motion to adopt Resolution #23-042 approving the Preliminary Plat with modifications as specified by City Council. Alternative 3: Motion to deny the Preliminary Plat based on specific findings identified by City Council. The Preliminary Plat generally conforms with the Design Framework and City Code, with the necessary revisions noted in Proj ectDox. Staff does not support this alternative. Funding Source: All costs associated with this application are the Applicant's responsibility. Recommendation: