My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Public Works Committee - 03/21/2023
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Public Works Committee
>
2023
>
Agenda - Public Works Committee - 03/21/2023
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/28/2025 9:19:40 AM
Creation date
3/16/2023 3:51:28 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Public Works Committee
Document Date
03/21/2023
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
69
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
City Engineer/Public Works Director Westby replied that there can be a deferred assessment and <br />provided a past example. He stated that staff could further explore that potential. <br />Parks & Assistant Public Works Director Riverblood commented that if the City is trying to secure <br />right-of-way for no cost, it would be difficult to add on a deferred assessment. <br />Councilmember Musgrove asked if the right-of-way would need to be purchased. <br />Economic Development Manager Sullivan commented that there is some easement, but not a road <br />easement. He noted another deferred assessment situation, noting that although finance does not <br />prefer that method, it has been used in the past. <br />Chairperson Riley commented that there could be some merit to the deferred assessment concept. <br />City Engineer/Public Works Director Westby commented that it seems there is agreement in <br />connecting to Bunker Lake Boulevard. <br />Economic Development Manager Sullivan asked if the group is comfortable building the project <br />this year. <br />Chairperson Riley asked if engineering could handle that task. <br />City Engineer/Public Works Director Westby replied that Bolton & Menk is working on the plans <br />currently and is at 90 percent completion. He stated that plan development is being funded through <br />the PIR fund and the funding for the road project is yet to be determined, which is why there were <br />discussing the possibility of assessment. He stated that it seems there is consensus not to assess <br />the current properties. <br />Councilmember Musgrove asked if the assessment could be used in negotiation for the purchase <br />of right-of-way. <br />City Administrator Hagen confirmed that could be done, explaining that otherwise the parties <br />would just be handing checks back and forth for the different costs. <br />Councilmember Musgrove stated that it would be worth it to determine what an assessment might <br />look like and compare that to the purchase of right-of-way costs. She stated that she would be <br />interested in seeing the full option for the project, but also narrowed down to just the new portion <br />of the road. <br />Chairperson Riley stated that the City has eliminated assessments first with the franchise fee and <br />then changing that to being on the tax roll, therefore he would feel uncomfortable assessing for the <br />road project. <br />Councilmember Musgrove acknowledged that point but stated that with development the cost of <br />roads is assessed. <br />Public Works Committee / February 21, 2023 <br />Page 9 of 12 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.