Laserfiche WebLink
larger stormwater pond would be a benefit, he would like to know as EDA dollars could be <br /> contributed towards the cost for acquiring that portion of property. <br /> Member Riley commented that this area is commercial/industrial, and this stormwater pond would <br /> seem to make the area more usable and better for future development. He stated that the road <br /> improvement project would also seem to enhance the value of the area to increase interest in <br /> development of this area. <br /> Economic Development Manager Sullivan agreed that typically a road project would not fall under <br /> the review of the EDA but explained that City utilities will be added in order to attract future <br /> development. <br /> Member Johnson stated that once the dome is constructed that could attract different ancillary uses <br /> to the area. <br /> Economic Development Manager Sullivan agreed that there has been a lot of discussion about the <br /> development interest that a sports dome could bring. <br /> Member Riley stated that the proposed location seems to be a great spot for the regional stormwater <br /> pond. He asked if there would be more developable land for the northern properties. <br /> Economic Development Manager Sullivan provided background information on stormwater in this <br /> area noting that the three parcels marked in red would benefit from a larger stormwater pond not <br /> all of the properties in the area. <br /> Member Olson asked if the proposed regional pond would eliminate or reduce the onsite ponding <br /> for the ARAA site, which could expand parking on that site. <br /> Economic Development Manager Sullivan replied that would provide more flexibility for ARAA <br /> to reduce the stormwater treatment provided onsite. <br /> Chairperson MacLennan stated that he likes the regional stormwater pond concept. He stated that <br /> everything east of Ferret Street is designated COR and could have retail shopping uses. He stated <br /> that ultimately as a member of the EDA he would like to see the two rental properties redeveloped <br /> with more desired uses. He asked if the building on the PSD property would be demolished. <br /> Economic Development Manager Sullivan replied that PSD has communicated to the city that it <br /> will will be demolishing that building when this project moves forward. <br /> Chairperson MacLennan asked where the pond is for that property. <br /> Economic Development Manager Sullivan identified the existing pond for that property. He noted <br /> that the regional stormwater pond is still hypothetical and will depend on how the sports dome <br /> project moves forward. He stated that his intention was to determine whether the EDA would find <br /> it beneficial to provide some funding for that enhancement in return for the economic benefit that <br /> could be received in return. <br /> Economic Development Authority/February 9. 2023 <br /> Page 6 of 9 <br />