My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Minutes - Public Works Committee - 01/17/2006
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Minutes
>
Public Works Committee
>
2006
>
Minutes - Public Works Committee - 01/17/2006
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/17/2025 3:01:28 PM
Creation date
3/7/2006 11:07:30 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Type
Public Works Committee
Document Date
01/17/2006
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
14
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
sewer and water in without assessments, and putting in curb and gutter, street and storm sewer. <br />The Helium Street connection was the main concern. Another significant concern was that there <br />was a Due-On-Sale clause, and a requirement to hook up within a certain number of years of <br />availability. Both of those issues have been resolved with the Northwest Sewer Extension <br />Project. Mr. Olson advised his understanding is since the City had put significant funding in the <br />feasibility for both neighborhoods, nothing of which was reimbursed, that the City would not <br />move forward with another project like this until there ~vas a request. He advised this petition <br />should be forwarded to the City Attomey to be sure it is correct as to form. Support of more than <br />35% of the property owners is required by City Code to require a feasibility study. <br /> <br />Councilmember Cook stated he was very supportive of this project the first time it was discussed <br />and is happy to see there is more support from the neighborhood. <br /> <br />Assistant Public Works Director Olson explained there were two contingencies in City Code that <br />were nerve wracking for the residents, and some non-trust at the time this was previously <br />discussed. At that time the City was contemplating a pilot project of up-fronting the sewer and <br />water, and allowing the developer to hook up as they determined to try to recoup the cost. He <br />would suggest this feasibility study be prepared like the feasibility study that was done for Ebony <br />Street where the cost is identified and attributed to the benefiting properties along with the trunk, <br />SAC and WAC fees. Mr. Olson explained when the two feasibility studies were previously <br />completed the development plans to the north were not known. There is an existing sewer pipe <br />that comes in through 152na and Germanium Street over to the existing City Hall and it was not <br />known if there would be full basements and grade issues related with extending the pipe to <br />Helium Street and 150th Lane. This is not a concern with the current development proposal. Mr. <br />Olson explained one of the issues in the feasibility study was the constructability of a 25-foot <br />deep sewer at the intersection of 150th and Helium Street. However, knowing now that sewer is <br />not necessary for the development to the north, the sewer can be kept much shallower, and the <br />construction necessary to get it in there would be less intrusive on the neighborhood to the east. <br />He advised there would be some benefit to the water improvements with the creation of another <br />loop, which would help to freshen up the water supply. <br /> <br />Councilmember Cook asked if there would be a benefit of leverage by completing this project at <br />the same time as the bigger project. <br /> <br />City Engineer Jankowski replied not likely if the Chapter 429 process is used. <br /> <br />Mr. Murphy stated he would be willing to put in as much time and energy as is needed to work <br />with the residents. This project would be a great benefit for the residents in the area. The costs <br />will be a concern for some of the residents and he will do what he can to try to allay concerns. <br /> <br />Assistant Public Works Director Olson explained it will take time to get the feasibility study <br />updated, followed by a time period before a public hearing can be held. Once the public hearing <br />is held there is a two-month waiting period to allow people the opportunity to counter-petition <br />the improvements. A 100% petition from the property owners would be required to sign off on <br />the 60-day waiting period. <br /> <br />Public Works Committee/January 17, 2006 <br /> Page 2 of 14 <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.