Laserfiche WebLink
April 17, 1989 <br />Pase Two <br /> <br />Mr. Ban~art stated that Anoka Count~ has a ~=11 property near the 116 Bridge <br /> <br />Hartley specifically pointed our that this proposed Dayton/ Kamsey bridge is not <br />~ntended to be in c~pet~tion with the ~oka/~pl~n bridge for the State's <br /> <br />proposed. ~e proposed Dayton/R~sey bridge ~s lon~rante planning, po:enti~!y <br /> <br />entered into between Anoka and Ramsey. that {t be done at the ti:~e the 116 hrld£e <br />is bu~/t. In further discussion Hartley stated that as of July 1989 Ra~sey will. <br /> <br />municipal water. Those same concerns will be held for Ramsey. <br /> <br />moving the tlighway 47 alignment very far. He felt these concerns should be <br /> <br /> <br />