My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Council - 12/16/1980
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Council
>
1980
>
Agenda - Council - 12/16/1980
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/15/2025 2:08:11 PM
Creation date
3/21/2006 8:03:52 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Council
Document Date
12/16/1980
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
136
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
LOCAL' GOVERNMENT AID DISTRIBUTIONS <br />The basic initial objective of the LGA distributions is .stated in the <br />Minnesota Dept. of Revenue Publication dealing with these distributions. <br />It succintly states "THE INTENT OF LOCAL GOVEKNMENT AID IS TO PROVIDE <br />PKOPERTY TAX RELIEF FOR ALL PROPERTY TAXPAYERS". One would assume that <br />the intent would necessarily be to provide that relief FAIRLY as among <br />property taxpayers. This issue of the MLOSC Newsletter has as its central <br />purpose to display the extent to which this "relief" is provided FAIRLY <br />as among propecty taxpayers throughout Minnesota. <br /> Back~6und: <br /> The flrstLocal Government Aid distributions in 1972 and 1973 replaced <br /> the Exempt Property Reimbursement and Sales Tax per capita aids that <br /> were enacted by the 1967 legislature as part of the Tax Reform and Relief <br /> Act of 1967· In 1973, the following aids were also incorporated for <br /> cities into the Local Government Aid Minimum distributions: -Cigarette and Liquor Tax "aids" <br /> -Bank Excise Tax "aids" <br /> -Railroad and Telephone Gross Earnings Tax "aids", and <br /> -Mortgage Registry Tax "aids". <br /> Until 1980, the metropolitan 7 county area was treated ms~t entity for <br /> calculating purposes, while for the rest of the State each~County was <br /> consi~ereg-a separate_entity~ W~t~ the changes.by-the~1979 legislature, <br /> the dzstrzbutions have been treateo on a Statew~de basis for the years <br /> 1980 and 1981, although the underlying calculation bases have not changed. <br /> The formula has remained basically the same for all cities, using a 3 year <br /> average mill rate, a property sales ratio (ratio 75 assessed valuation to <br /> actual property sales value) and population. Until 1980, the result o~ <br /> · - ............ lied to the Statewtde distribution <br /> multi, lying.these, three z~or~ w~ C~ e~o~o..~ for-1929)~' For~t0wn- <br /> figure. (as 'for example,-~59 per-capita ......... <br /> ships,' the calculation was essentially the same~ When the~distributi°ns <br /> were calculated, the County governments, with some excePtions, received <br /> previously determined amounts,~ with the~balance then being-distributed <br /> according to formula.factors. <br /> Although this area is seemingly complex, it is comparatively simple. <br /> It is ~rucially important that each city take the time to understand the <br /> mechanzcs because of the gross disparities which exist and continue to <br /> grow· <br /> The Minnesota League of Small Cities has developed a computer capability <br /> to examine and display the results to make them understandable for small <br /> city officials, members of the legislature and also the Executive branch <br /> of the State Government who are not fully conversant with the mechanics <br /> and the end results· <br /> The following factors of disparity are present and deserve close attention <br /> by all those concerned with fairness and equitab,ility in the LGA distri- <br /> butions. , <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.