Laserfiche WebLink
Ms. Ingrid Ritchie, Minnesota Department of Health, listed the issues from <br />a public health standpoint, which were: l) potential for water pollution, <br />2) potentional health risks from odor problems and 3) potential explosion <br />hazard from the methane gas. She said the measures that have been instituted <br />have eliminated the explosion hazard & they didn't find a reading high enough <br />to be a health hazard. She said there are trace contaminants in gas streams <br />from industrial contaminants. The work that has been completed shows that <br />Cl. Hydrocarbons have not been detected but that is not to say they may not <br />be found. She said residents have reported symptoms of nausea and headaches <br />from smelling gases. The symptoms are not permanent and if a person gets out <br />of the gas stream, they will feel better. She said she did not mean to minimize <br />any symptoms that have been reported, but there isn't anything that would <br />indicate a health risk at this time. <br /> In terms of ground water contamination, they performed the same tests as are <br /> being done on test wells in the area and the results of those tests indicate <br /> at this time that the water is not being contaminated by any products from the <br /> landfill. She said she was not an expert on vegetation so she would not <br /> comment on the tree loss issue. <br /> Mayor Gamec asked Ms. Ritchie if there was any 'immediate health, welfare <br /> or safety type problem there. <br /> Ms. Ritchie said there was no immediate problem. <br /> Mayor Gamec asked Ms. Ritchie if the symptoms would disappear when a person <br /> gets out of the gas stream. <br /> Ms. Ritchie said some may be more sensitive than others. It varies from person <br /> to person. She said the measure that have been discussed will provide solutions <br /> to this problem. Any gases emitted will follow the air current, so the venting <br /> system will be moved farthe~ away from the residents. <br /> Mayor Gamec noted that basically, with the shallow wells, the city is more protected <br /> because gas can be detected sooner. <br /> Mr. Tom Clark, MPCA/Solid Waste Division, stated that the PCA stands by the <br /> report that had just been given and they took an active roll in putting that <br /> report together. He said there are no experts on the PCA staff on gas migration. <br /> On August 7th, he made three phone calls to the health department and <br /> explained the gas migration problem to them and they assigned Ingrid Ritchie <br /> to the case. He found Ms. Ritchie to be very capable and one of the best <br /> individuals, if not the best, in looking at a gas migration problem. He <br /> said he called Mr. Frank Flower who had visited a lot of states regarding the <br /> gas migration from landfills and requested he come out to Minnesota to see <br /> the Anoka Landfill, but he was not able to do so. However, a study of <br /> Mr. Flower's came out and visited the site on August 23, 1980 and spent the <br /> better part of three hours there and talked to the neighbors. He gave them <br /> the benefit of his review. <br /> Mayor Gamec asked Don Farb, Consultant from Barr Engineering, for his comments. <br /> Mr. Farb said that Barr Engineering Co. had been hired to look at the monitoring <br /> programs for the four landfills in the county. Their scope was to look at the <br /> g~ound water to see if there were contaminants there and they provided <br /> Co~issioner McGinley with their report the morning of the meeting. <br /> C/September 8, 1980 Page 3 <br /> <br /> <br />