My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Council - 01/27/1981
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Council
>
1981
>
Agenda - Council - 01/27/1981
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/15/2025 1:36:28 PM
Creation date
3/21/2006 8:42:56 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Council
Document Date
01/27/1981
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
114
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
corE. ulting <br />eng n,e, ers <br />diversified <br /> <br />Main Office." P.O. Box J. Osseo. Minnesota 55369 (6"12) 425-2181 <br />South Office: 8500 21Dth St. W.. Lakevllle. Minnesota 5-5044 (612) 469-3881 <br /> <br />January 6, 1981 <br /> <br />Mr. Kenneth Peterson, Chairman <br />Ramsey Planning and Zoning Commission <br />City of Ramsey <br />15153 Nowthen Boulevard N.W. <br />Anoka, Minnesota 55303 <br /> <br />Re: Preliminary Plat Review of <br /> Verndale Commercial Park <br /> <br />Dear Mr. Peterson: <br /> <br />This preliminary plat consists of two lots and two outlots. The plat is situated <br />on the Anoka County and Sherburne County line North of U.S. Highway No. 10. This <br />area is zoned B-1. <br /> <br />Following is a list of comments resulting from our review of this preliminary <br />plat: <br /> <br />1. This plan does not show the existing zoning of the land adjacent to this <br /> plat as required under City Ordinance No. 170.037B-c. <br /> <br />The width and type of roadway surface should be shown on the plat along <br />with other existing characteristics as stated in City Ordinance No. <br />170.037B-f. <br /> <br /> ~ .3. Soil borings were not supplied with the preliminary plat as required <br /> ~,2. under City Ordinance No. 170.037B-i. <br /> <br /> ~ 4. As stated in comment number 9 of the sketch plan review, the preliminary <br /> .,'plat abutts U.S. Highway No. 10, 52 & 169 and direct access is not per- <br />- -~ .?'mitred as per Article No. 170.038E7 of the City Code. Also no access is <br />~m"l~'~,' provided to adjoining properties. <br /> 5. The width of the easements between the lots and the outlot are not shown <br /> on the plan as required under City Ordinance No. 170.037C-b. <br /> <br />As stated in comment number 5 of the sketch plan review, there are no <br />park areas shown on the plat to be dedicated; therefore, the developer <br />will be required to pay a park fee in lieu of land. <br /> <br />7. Disposal of storm drainage water must be addressed as required under City <br /> Ordinance No. 170.037C-g. <br /> <br />8. The setback line along U.S. Highways 10, 52 & 169 is shown at 40 feet and <br /> the required setback as amended by City Ordinance No. 80-3 is 50 feet. <br /> <br /> /~,""~ cml · municipal · planning · environmental · land surveying · geotechn~s · w~te treotrneclt <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.