My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Council - 02/24/1981
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Council
>
1981
>
Agenda - Council - 02/24/1981
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/15/2025 1:37:07 PM
Creation date
3/21/2006 9:03:01 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Council
Document Date
02/24/1981
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
175
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
~yor Gamec stated the City uses Springstad now on sn informal basis <br />snd is satisfied with their work. <br /> Attorney Goodrich stated Springstad now wants an agreement to act as <br /> an agent for the City of R~msey. <br /> Motion by Councilman Sorteberg and seconded by CounCilman Cox to <br /> enter into a contract with Sprlngstad Fiscal Agent on a "per call <br /> basis". <br /> Motion carried. Voting yes: ~ayor Gamec, CounCilman Sorteberg, <br /> Councilman Reim~n, Councilman Cox and Councilwoman VanWagner' <br /> Voting no: None. <br /> c~SE #6 Addendum - Rail Corridor Study (encl D2 Case 6): <br /> The Council for the City of R~msey passed and adopted Resolution #81-2 <br /> Resolution regarding a Railroad UnderpaSS at State Trunk Highway #47 <br /> in ~noka, February 10, 1981. <br /> N~yor G~mec stated there is a meeting in Moorhead in regard to the <br /> Rail Corridor Study. <br /> Motion by~ayor G~mec and seconded by Councilwoman VanWagner to <br /> forward a copy to the Rail Corridor Study Conference in Moorhead <br /> of our Resolution #81-2 Resolution regarding a Railroad Underpass at <br /> State Trunk Highway #47 in Anoka. <br /> Motion carried. Voting yes: Mayor G~mec, Councilman Sorteberg, <br /> Councilman Reim~un, Councilman Cox and Councilwoman VanWagner' <br /> Voting no: None. <br /> <br /> COUNCIL NEW BusINESS <br /> l) Zoning of Farmland for Agricultural use (Encl D3-a Case #1). <br /> The Council noted receipt of the Metro Agricultural Land preservation <br /> information, a model zoning ordinance to protect productive <br /> agricultural land and what local government should know about the <br /> new Metropolitan Agricultural Preservation Act information. <br /> Citizen Hat,id Hunt came before the Council representing a delegation <br /> of farmers to inquire about changing zoning back to agricultural <br /> zoning for the delegation. <br /> Councilman Cox stated the biggest concern of the delegation is the <br /> preservation of their rights to raise livestock. <br /> ~ayor Gamec stated the Council would be reasonable in regard to <br /> livestock as long as the nuisance ordinance is respected and the <br /> nuisance ordin~uce will still be in effect regardless of changing <br /> in zoning to agricultural- <br /> citizen Harold Hunt stated agricultural zoning would tie up your <br /> property for eight years and make it difficult to sell a parcel <br /> and maintain agricultural status. <br /> Councilman Sorteberg suggested for parcels with 20 acres or more <br /> c/February 10, 1981 <br /> 7 <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.