My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Council - 03/28/2006
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Council
>
2006
>
Agenda - Council - 03/28/2006
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/19/2025 3:01:16 PM
Creation date
3/24/2006 2:21:46 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Council
Document Date
03/28/2006
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
389
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
on these street shall consist of six inches of class $ gTanutar base, two inches of <br />bituminous ba~e course, and two inches of bituminous wear course on these streets. <br /> <br />Drainage shall be provided through ~aded roadside ditches and new driveway culverts <br />over the majority of the project Ieng~; however, in an effort to avoid tree impacts it is <br />proposed that a bituminous berm curb be placed along I63rd Lane and the southernmost <br />400 feet of Urammite Street. Drainage shall be conveyed from the southeast portion of <br />the project area to the Varolite Street ditchline. Drainage from the southeast portion of <br />the project area shall be conveyed to County Ditch 3/66 which crosses 164~n Avenue <br />between Sapphire and Quartz Street. Drainage from the majority of the project area shall <br />be conveyed to the wetland which is located south of t64m Lane and east of Sapphire <br />Street. Figure 2 illustrates the proposed drainage panems including curblines, spillways, <br />ditches and culverts. It should be noted that 16421 Sapphire street has a mound septic <br />system which is located at least partially within the ri~t of way of Sapphire Street. The <br />proposed drainage plan eliminates the need for a ditch section past this location to avoid <br />conflict with this system. <br /> <br />This project does not anticipate the connection of private driveways to the new <br />bituminous roadway. The cost of th/s connection, if desired, will be the responsibility of <br />the individual property owners. Where it is necessary to remove existing driveways for <br />the installation of culverts or to accommodate a transition to the new roadway, such <br />driveways shall be neatly saw cut and replaced with like material as a portion of the <br />project cost. Disturbed tufted areas shall be restored with fertilizer, seed and mulch. <br /> <br />ESTIMATED COSTS <br /> <br />The construction cost for this project is estimated to be $200,595 which is detailed in <br />Appendix B. In addition to the estimated construction costs an additional 25% has been <br />included to cover the overhead cost associated with this project. These costs include; <br />en~neering design 8%; project administration 5%; bonding and legal 2%; inspection and <br />testing 5%; and 5% for contingencies. The total project cost for this project is therefore <br />estimated to be $250,744. <br /> <br />FINANCING <br /> <br />It is proposed to finance one half (50%) of the total project cost, $125,372 though special <br />assessments to the benefited properties adjacent to the improved streets consistent with <br />Minnesota State Statutes 429 and City of Ramsey Code Chapter 4. The remaining 50%, <br />or $125,372 of the project will be financed with City of Ramsey general tax funds. The <br />assessed portion of the project cost shall be equally assessed among the benefited 19 <br />properties listed in Appendix C. This would result in an assessment of $6,599 per <br />proper~y. If a property owner would elect to have tl'fis assessment collected over a ten <br />year period at an estimated interest rate of 6.5%, annual payments would range from <br />$I089 to $703 over this ten year period. It should be noted that five of the t9 properties <br />are owned by two property owners and their assessments would be multiples of the above <br />values. . <br /> <br />-192- -3- <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.