My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Council - 03/28/2006
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Council
>
2006
>
Agenda - Council - 03/28/2006
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/19/2025 3:01:16 PM
Creation date
3/24/2006 2:21:46 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Council
Document Date
03/28/2006
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
389
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
developed. He indicated the road will have to be redone to provide City utilities in the <br />future. <br /> <br />Commissioner Johnson asked how long the cul-de-sac is as shown. <br /> <br />Mr. Stradlund indicated it is not quite 700 feet. He stated he will continue to give the <br />Meloches an easement to get out of their property into the cul-de-sac. <br /> <br />Commissioner Brauer asked if that easement would be paved. <br /> <br />Mr. Stradlund stated it would not be paved to City standards. He indicated he would <br />provide easements and pave a driveway to the Malash property. <br /> <br />Commissioner Brauer noted that this is pushing the limits of a cul-de-sac length, and he <br />may need a variance. <br /> <br />Chairperson Nixt asked where the septic would be located. <br /> <br />Mr. Stradlund indicated it would be on the northern property. <br /> <br />Commissioner Van Scoy indicated that at sometime the City Council expects this will be <br />R-1 and developed fully. He asked what they do with this type of septic system at that <br />time. <br /> <br />Mr. Stradlund stated he is actually working on a project now that went to City sewer and <br />the soil has to be treated, it can be done. <br /> <br /> Commissioner Johnson asked if they would be looking at density transition as they look <br /> at these sketch plans. <br /> <br /> Associate Planner Wald stated when the Cluster Ordinance was in the renew process it <br /> was assumed that density transition apply, but after further research it does not appear <br /> density transition would apply. She stated the reason is that the development is going <br /> from R-1 to R-1. <br /> <br /> Chairperson Nixt stated, however, that the section being developed is higher density than <br /> would be allowed on a regular R-1 development. He indicated they are getting a higher <br /> concentration, which is impacting the adjoining development, and he questions not <br /> requiring density transitioning. <br /> <br /> Commissioner Brauer argued that it does, reading the code. He stated this is the question <br /> he raised at the last meeting on whether density transitioning in the code for R-1 to R-1 is <br /> in affect or R-1 to Rural Developing. <br /> <br /> Assistant Community Development Director Frolik noted they have to separate density <br /> with lot size. <br /> <br />-272- <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.