Laserfiche WebLink
I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> <br />the ground water, there would be protection to the extent <br />possible by State and Federal laws. <br />Doug H~mm - Inquired if Waste Management can be held accountable <br />for the existing site now? <br />Mr. LeFevere - Stated that currently the parent corporation cannot <br />be held accountable; the subsidiary can. <br /> Brenda Bauerkemper - Referred to June 25, 1984 public hearing <br /> minutes and comments by Erika Sitz regarding cases where the <br /> parent company has been traced for remedial action. <br /> LeFevere - Stated he cannot respond to Ms. Sitz' remarks; that <br /> he doesn't know the circumstances of PCA getting back to the <br /> parent corporation. <br /> Roger Shaski - 7020 153rd Avenue - There is no guarantee that <br /> Waste Management and parent company, State and Federal agencies <br /> will always be solvent; it could come back to the citizens. <br /> Mr. LeFevere - If all that did happen, the City would have t?. <br /> r su 1- s stem and the burden wouzo <br /> take care of it's own wate pP Y Y <br /> be on the City. Local companies will be solvent as long as <br /> the company is in operation. The permit provides considerably <br /> more protection. <br /> Mr. Shaski - What if problems occur 15 years after Waste <br /> Management is through with the site? <br /> Mr. LeFevere If there is no assistance from Federal, State <br /> and County government, or any other governmental agency; if <br /> Waste Management local and international are no longer solvent; <br /> if Anoka is no longer solvent; then it would fall back on the <br /> citizens of R~msey. <br /> Larry Phillips - 6640 153rd Lane NW - Referred to June 25, 1984 <br /> public hearing minutes, page 14, Erika Sitz comments. <br /> Chairman Peterson - Stated that Ms. Sitz'comment~ were her~ <br /> opinions and does not make it law. <br /> Larry Phillips - Anoka should be stuck with any and future <br /> liabilities resulting from the landfill. <br /> Chairman Peterson inquired if Ramsey has any liabilities if <br /> nothing changes. <br /> Mr. LeFevere - Cities have been held liable for negligent <br /> inspection. This would be a fairly remote possibility as <br /> ~mmsey does not ~onitor or regulate the site. Another <br /> ~0tential liabilxty has to do with the fact that Ramsey currently <br /> regards itself as having property rights in this property <br /> under the contract with the City of Anoka. If this package goes <br /> through, it is possible that the City will never have legal <br /> title. I would be concerned that at some future date if people <br /> <br />I p & Z/July 3, 1984 <br /> <br /> <br />