My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Council - 04/28/1981
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Council
>
1981
>
Agenda - Council - 04/28/1981
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/15/2025 1:38:14 PM
Creation date
3/27/2006 11:29:16 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Council
Document Date
04/28/1981
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
153
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
A �' Y <br />M -2- <br />If the League amendments don't go on to S.F. 635, TIF will be a much less workable tool <br />and fewer cities will be able to take advantage of it. As discussed below, more and more <br />smaller cities are beginning to use TIF. Certain parts of S.F. 635 as amended would be <br />especially harmful to smaller cities and projects. Those parts are pointed out in the <br />section - by - section - summary. <br />WHO IS USING TIF? <br />It is worth noting that since 1968, 105 cities in Minnesota have initiated or planned <br />193 TIF projects. <br />Over two - thirds of the cities using TIF are located outside the metropolitan area. Of <br />the 193 projects in the state, 99 are located in cities under 10,000 population. <br />More and more cities under 10,000 population are taking advantage of TIF. In 1978 15 <br />of these small cities started their first TIF project, and 10 more followed in 1979. <br />In 1980, 15 more of these small cities have started or are planning their first project. <br />A total of 53 projects were begun in small cities in the last three years. Even if your <br />city is not now using TIF, this option for community development must be preserved! <br />* SUMMARY OF S.F. 635 PROBLEM AREAS <br />1. S.F. 635 WOULD CAUSE ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT TIF DISTRI <br />Summary M.S. 273.73, subd. 4, defines captured assessed value (CAV) under <br />the tax increment law. Under section 1 of S.F. 635, the CAV of parcels in <br />economic development districts would be included in adjusted assessed value <br />of each school district for purposes of computing school aids. The state <br />would end up paying less school aids and the school district would still <br />receive the same amount for pupils, but the local tax payer would pay a <br />higher school mill rate. <br />League Amendment <br />• Strike Section 1. <br />Explanation of Amendment <br />This part of S.F. 635 would build into every economic development proposal - a high level <br />of local opposition to TIF. Since a higher school levy would be the direct result of any <br />economic development project, city officials would be understandably much more reluctant <br />to approve such a project. Since school district boundaries are hot conterminous with <br />city boundaries, there would be increased pressure from county or township officials to <br />oppose the use of TIF for economic development. <br />By removing Section 1 of S.F. 635, the League amendment would prevent this indirect <br />attempt to restrict the use of TIF for economic development. <br />NOTE: Senator Hanson has indicated he feels strongly about including this particular <br />provision in the bill. <br />2. DATE FOR DETERMINATION OF "ORIGINAL ASSESSED VALUE" MODIFIED - THE INTENT IS <br />rarocncG TWr RaCF vniiiF (IF M STRICT AND DECREASE THE TAX INCREMENT. <br />Summary M.S. 273.73, subd. 7, now defines "original assessed value" as the value <br />of taxable property in a TIF district as most recently certified by the Commissioner <br />of Revenue. Section 2 of S.F. 635 would change that date to January 2 of the year <br />in which the request for certification of a TIF district occurs. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.