Laserfiche WebLink
_ <br />b. Council Resolution 81 -9 adopted March 10, 1981, which <br />received report set date for public hearing and contains <br />excerpts of March 10, 1981 Council minutes. <br />c. Memo to City Administrator giving statistical information <br />on the petition for the improvement. <br />d. Petition requesting improvement. <br />e. Public hearing notice and list of parties notified. <br />Motion by Councilman Reimann and seconded by Councilman Cox to <br />adopt Resolution 81 -14 ordering improvement and preparation <br />of plan. (Please refer to Resolution File for Resolution 81 -14 ). <br />Motion carried. Voting yes: Mayor Gamec, Councilman Reiman, <br />Councilman Cox, Councilman sorteberg. Voting no: None. Abstaining: <br />Councilwoman Van Wagner. <br />• <br />5) Urban Development Permit; case of James Refrigeration <br />Mr. Dick Kvanbeck from James Refrigeration came before the council <br />with a sketch plan and asked the council for a determination <br />regarding the location of 152nd Lane N.W. <br />The following background information was supplied to the Council <br />in the agenda for consideration: <br />a. Council minutes dated November 13, 1978. <br />b. County Engineer's letter dated November 15, 1978. <br />c. City Engineer's report dated November 13, 1978. <br />d. City Engineer's report dated April 7, 1981. <br />e. P &Z minutes April 7, -1981. <br />• <br />Mayor Gamec stated the previous plan for an urban permit was a tentative <br />plan. James Refrigeration is planning to put in a superette and <br />self service gas station. Councilman Cox stated the road should <br />be between lots to stay consistent. Mr. Alfred Albert came before <br />the Council and stated he represented Mr. Marx, the Contract for <br />Deed holder, Mr. Holosek, and Mary Gorham, the fee owner at the <br />time and that no one received a notice of potential development <br />or were aware of a proposal - alleged proposal, for subdivision or <br />any proposal laying out 152nd Avenue. He also stated two problems <br />with the location. one problem is that it would be a blind <br />intersection on the side of a hill and the second problem is <br />a drainage problem. <br />The Council discussed the issue and City Administrator Schnelle <br />suggested the city should authorize a joint access north of the subject <br />property and take an easement- ingress or one to the south. <br />C /April 14, 1981 <br />4 <br />