Laserfiche WebLink
5:50 P.M. <br />N~ay 6, 1981 <br /> <br />The Council Personnel Committee met at 5:50 P.N., Wednesday, May 6, <br />1981, at the Ramsey Nunicipal Center Conference Room, 15153 Nowthen <br />Blvd. N.W., Ramsey, Minnesota. <br />Nembers Present: CounciLmember Reimann <br /> Couucilmemb er Sorteberg <br /> <br />Also Present: Lloyd G. Schnelle, City E~ployee <br /> Clayton R. Berg, City Employee <br /> The purpose of the meetin8 was to discuss the need of filling the pro- <br /> posed Assistant Administrative Assistant position. The City Admini- <br /> strator stated that at the last Council meeting it was requested that <br /> he prepare a list of duties that the proposed Assistant Administrative <br /> Assistant would be expected to do in that position. Consequently, the <br /> City Administrator stated that he had prepared a list of these duties <br /> in the memo for their review and action. The Council Personnel Committee <br /> revieged the memo dated May 6, 1981 (which is attached as enclosure (1) <br /> to these minutes). <br /> A general discussion followed in regards to the need for an Assistant <br /> Administrative Assistant in the City of Ramsey. It was stated that <br /> there was a need for the position, however, at this time with such a <br /> bad economiC climate here in the Ramsey area and the whole Metro ~rea <br /> it was felt that the City should hold up on filling' the position of <br /> the Assistant A~mtuistrative Assistant. <br /> It was pointed out to the Personnel Committee that the present City <br /> Staff could not take on the Job that Council directed at their last <br /> meeting which was to catalog all the non conforming uses in the City <br /> of P~ey. The Personnel Committee stated ~that they felt it should <br /> only be done on a demaud basis where they receive citizen complaints. <br /> It was further pointed out that they should consider using a Planning <br /> Consultant on certain cases such as to finish winding up the following <br /> projects: <br /> a) City Comprehensive Plan <br /> b) City Wild and Scenic Rivers Ordinsnce <br /> c) City Critical Areas Plan <br /> It was further pointed out that the major hold ups on the above studies <br /> were the following issues: <br /> <br /> a) Designation of the rural and urban area, and <br /> b) Lot sizes in the rural areas <br /> <br />Personnel Committee <br /> May 6, 1981 <br /> <br /> <br />