Laserfiche WebLink
Agenda Page 7 of 11 <br />Notification: <br />No notification is required. <br />Observations/Alternatives: <br />Strategic Goals <br />As part of the 2013 City Council Strategic Goals, Staff has been analyzing expenses related to the <br />administration of building permits, as well as the most cost effective way to deliver these services <br />while providing continuity and stability in an efficient manner. The 2013 Strategic Plan notes a <br />recruitment of a Building Official, a position that is currently being served by contracted services. <br />After a full calendar year of analysis of contracting for Building Official services, it appears that <br />recruiting a Building Official as a full-time, regular City employee remains fairly budget neutral. In <br />addition, Staff is currently exploring ways to effectively and efficiently deliver these services. Staff <br />is currently exploring such things as ePermits, electronic/wireless field data entry, and <br />streamlined/automated reporting; many of which have already been implemented. <br />The current rate for contracted services with Inspectron is $50 per hour. Current service levels have <br />required 40 hours per week of Building Official services and 20-30 hours per week of building <br />inspection and plan review services. Specific to the Building Official function (not base inspection <br />and plan review), it is assumed that the need is 2,000 hours of work hours required for the Building <br />Official. The potential annual budgetary impacts are estimated at $100,000. However, in 2012, the <br />budgetary impact was $91,000. Note: Due to the fact that the original contract was to provide <br />building inspection and plan review services, and did not include providing Building Official <br />services, it is anticipated that the contract may need to be revised to reflect the actual services <br />provided in the future. Staff would recommend that the City remain with contract services for <br />building inspection and plan review services on an as needed basis. Contracted services allow the <br />City to respond better to seasonal variations in service level needs. In addition, the contracted <br />services provide access to additional areas of expertise and review. <br />However, contracted services for the Building Official role presents the possibility of disruption in <br />the continuity of delivery of services . There are two (2) options to consider for providing Building <br />Official services, depending on the level of guaranteed coverage the City Council is comfortable in <br />providing. Option 1 would be to hire a Building Official as a regular, full-time employee of the City. <br />This option would appear to be the preferred option if the City Council decides 40 hours of coverage <br />per week is necessary year round. However, Option 2 would be to continue with contracted services <br />for the Building Official. This option would be acceptable if the City Council is comfortable in <br />assuming that the Building Official hours could be reduced in the non -peak times, thus creating <br />some gaps in coverage. <br />The City does not have full control over assignments directed by the contracted services. The <br />contracted service could decide to re -assign its staff over time to other locations resulting in the loss <br />of expertise and know how specific to Ramsey. As each community has slightly different processes, <br />rates, and permit software, it is necessary to provide the individual contractor with professional <br />development related to the City's unique features and culture. Naturally, there are direct and indirect <br />costs involved in contractor development and staff is concerned with potential turnover. <br />Staff would recommend an external recruitment to hire a full-time regular Building Official. Given <br />the current fees paid for contracted Building Official services and the City's current Building <br />Official pay scale, the net savings to the City could be approximately $16,000 the first year with <br />continued savings in years 2, 3, 4, 5. Year 6 (step 6---top of the scale) would be the only year when <br />http://156.142.212.178:8080/print all.cfm?seq=692&reloaded=true 5/22/2013 <br />