My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
05/28/13
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Dissolved Boards/Commissions/Committees
>
Personnel Committee
>
Minutes
>
2013
>
05/28/13
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/21/2025 3:35:48 PM
Creation date
5/12/2023 3:10:53 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Minutes
Document Title
Personnel Committee
Document Date
05/28/2013
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
5
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Councilmember Backous agreed that Option 4 should not be considered. He stated support for <br />Option 3, noting one of the strategic goals was to be more inclusive with Boards and <br />Commissions and respect their time, expertise, and input. <br />Councilmember Kuzma agreed that Option 4 was not a good option. He agreed with <br />Councilmember Backous and supported Option 3 since it includes more people and provides <br />flexibility. <br />Chairperson Tossey stated Options 2 or 3 would be his preference. He stated as Chair of the <br />Personnel Committee, he had no idea that Councilmembers were participating in the Economic <br />Development Manager interviews. In addition, Mayor Strommen knew nothing about it. <br />Chairperson Tossey stated the communication aspect needs to be improved so the Mayor and <br />Personnel Committee Chair are aware of what is going on. He noted, with the last case (the <br />recent Economic Development Manager interviews), one could make a case that all on the City <br />Council had a stake in who was hired to run the City's economic development. <br />Councilmember Backous asked how to select which Councilmember would serve on the <br />Interview Panel. <br />City Administrator Ulrich accepted responsibility to the lack of communication relating to the <br />last issue and agreed it would be helpful to have an adopted policy. He suggested the matter <br />come before the Personnel Committee or full City Council to determine who should be selected <br />for the Interview Panel. <br />Councilmember Backous agreed it is important to make it not mandatory as some Committee <br />chairs may not be interested but he would support extending the offer. <br />Human Resources Manager Lasher stated the City has to be cautious of the Open Meeting Law <br />and it was brought to her attention by the League that many times people being interviewed do <br />not want their current employer to know, which becomes awkward if the interview occurs during <br />an open meeting. <br />Chairperson Tossey noted once a finalist, the applicant's name becomes public. <br />Human Resources Manager Lasher explained that after the person is considered a finalist <br />(following second interview if two are held) then their name is public but other information is <br />redacted and not made public. She stated she will write a resolution for Option 3 that will be <br />considered by the City Council at its June 11, 2013 meeting. <br />It was the consensus of the Personnel Committee to recommend that the City Council adopt a <br />Resolution to approve a policy regarding non -employee interview panel participation. <br />COMMITTEE INPUT <br />None. <br />Personnel Committee / May 28, 2013 <br />Page 4 of 5 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.