My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
10/15/13
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Dissolved Boards/Commissions/Committees
>
Personnel Committee
>
Agendas
>
2013
>
10/15/13
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/21/2025 3:32:37 PM
Creation date
5/12/2023 3:15:59 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Document Title
Personnel Committee
Document Date
10/15/2013
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
17
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
All three labor agreements included the following language: "*In the event that the 2014 health insurance renewal <br />comes in at a rate increase of greater than 10%; as may be the case due the Health Care Reform Act, at the request <br />of the bargaining unit, there will be a re -opener to negotiate the City's contributions. In any case, the City will <br />contribute no less than the 2014 amounts listed above." <br />The renewal came in at 13.3% due to additional healthcare reform taxes. Therefore, it is entirely possible that the <br />unions will request a re -opener to discuss the 2014 contributions. <br />Observations/Alternatives: <br />Although this case is for discussion only. The Personnel Committee may want to come to a consensus based on the <br />following options: <br />Option # 1: Retain the previously budgeted 2.5% increase in order to have flexibility based on the results of further <br />analysis and receipt of additional pending data and to offer the same health insurance benefit to the non -union group <br />as the unionized groups. <br />Option #2: Option # 1, plus direct staff to perform a League of Minnesota Cities wage study for each non -union <br />position in order to gather position specific market data and then use the remaining 1/2% to increase the position(s) <br />that are too low. <br />Option#3: Based on discussion. <br />Comment: In 2012, all staff members, except Department Heads, received a 2% increase -- Department Heads <br />received a 1% increase. This caused an even greater disparity within the compensation structure and the market. <br />Funding Source: <br />The preliminary 2014 budget has accounted for a 2.5% non -union COLA and the health insurance increases. Note: <br />The difference between a 2% increase and a 2.5% increase is about $6000 per year. . <br />Recommendation: <br />Staffs' recommendation for the 2014 non -union wages is to retain the previously budgeted 2.5% increase in order to <br />have flexibility based on the results of further analyses and receipt of additional pending data. <br />Staffs' recommendation for the 2014 non -union health insurance is to provide the same benefit as the unionized <br />groups. <br />Action: <br />Not applicable at this time - discussion only. <br />07-23-13 Work -Session Minutes <br />Overview of Wages and Health Insurance <br />Attachments <br />Form Review <br />Inbox Reviewed By Date <br />Kurt Ulrich Kurt Ulrich 10/10/2013 04:10 PM <br />Form Started By: Colleen Lasher Started On: 10/10/2013 12:21 PIM <br />Final Approval Date: 10/10/2013 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.